[2017] KEHC 3241 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3241 (KLR)

The court held that the filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory prerequisite under Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules for any party seeking to appeal a decision. Since the applicant had not filed a notice of appeal within the prescribed period, there was no basis for granting leave to appeal. The absence of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3241 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Applicant (Name not stated); Respondent: Respondents (Names not stated)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2274 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant (Name not stated)

Applicant

Respondents (Names not stated)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal can be granted where no notice of appeal has been filed as required by Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal is merited in the absence of a notice of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory prerequisite under Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules for any party seeking to appeal a decision. Since the applicant had not filed a notice of appeal within the prescribed period, there was no basis for granting leave to appeal. The absence of a notice of appeal rendered the application for leave incompetent and unmerited. Consequently, the court dismissed the application with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Motion dated 23rd November 2016 is dismissed with costs.