[2005] KEHC 1106 (KLR)
The court found that the estate in question is located in Thika and that the primary beneficiaries, including the two widows of the deceased, reside there. The convenience of the parties and the location of the estate outweigh the administrators' preference for Mombasa. The court exercised its discretion to transfer...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1106 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Ng’anga Kamau; Respondent: Joseph Itugi Kamau; Respondent: Patrick Mwangi Kamau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 109 B of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Succession Procedure, Transfer of Cause, Jurisdiction of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Ng’anga Kamau
Applicant
Joseph Itugi Kamau
Respondent
Patrick Mwangi Kamau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Succession Cause 109 B of 2004 should be transferred from Mombasa High Court to Nairobi High Court for final determination.
- 2 Whether the convenience of beneficiaries and location of the estate justify the transfer of the cause.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the estate in question is located in Thika and that the primary beneficiaries, including the two widows of the deceased, reside there. The convenience of the parties and the location of the estate outweigh the administrators' preference for Mombasa. The court exercised its discretion to transfer the cause to Nairobi High Court, where the beneficiaries can more easily participate in the proceedings. The transfer serves the interests of justice and efficient administration of the estate.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Succession Cause 109 B of 2004 is transferred to the High Court registry at Nairobi for all further proceedings.
- Costs to be borne by the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
6 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Succession Cause 109 B of 2004 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILFRED KAMAU ITUGI APPLICATION BY JOSEPH ITUGI KAMAU PATRICK MWANGI KAMAU Coram: Before Hon. Justice Mwera Peter Ng’anga for Applicant Joseph Kamau for 1st Respondent Patrick Kamau for 2nd Respondent Court clerk – Kazungu R U L I N G Peter Ng’anga Kamau, one of the sons of the late Wilfred Kamau Itugi, has asked this court to transfer this cause so that it is dealt with finally at Nairobi High Court. He said that the estate and all the beneficiaries etc are in Thika area. He stressed that the 2 widows of the late Wilfred can conveniently travel to the Nairobi registry on account of this matter. The applicant seemed also to say that the matter was filed here without the other family member’s knowledge/consent but that is not to be determined here.
The two administrators Joseph Itugi Kamau and Patrick Mwangi Kamau, did not see the need of moving this cause to Nairobi. Joseph lives in Mombasa and he thought that since the family gave him authority to handle the succession matters of this estate, he could do so through this registry. He saw no hitches or disputes at all. His brother Patrick had a similar view. That everything appears to be going on well except that Peter (the applicant) seems inclined to bring in hurdles etc here and there.
Having listened to the disputants here, may this cause be moved to the High Court registry Nairobi for the rest of the processes. The estate is said to be at Thika where the 2 widows of the deceased (mothers of the litigants here) and other beneficiaries reside. If need be, they can easily visit that registry.
It is so ordered. The costs to be borne by the estate.
Orders delivered on 9/11/2005.
J.W. MWERA JUDGE