[2005] KEHC 840 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 840 (KLR)

The court found that the transfer of land parcel Marama/Shiraha/449 to Gabriel Ocholi Mukoko was effected by a person who had been granted representation in Succession Cause No.121 of 1996. The respondent was a purchaser for value. Section 93 of the Law of Succession Act protects such transactions, even if the grant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KEHC 840 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Prisila Omungala Ndunyi; Applicant: George Okoth Aswani; Respondent: Gabriel Ocholi Mukoko
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 121 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Cancellation of Grant and Transfer
Outcome
Application allowed; orders cancelling the grant and transfer set aside.
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Revocation of Grant, Transfer of Land, Purchaser Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Revocation of Grant Transfer of Land Purchaser Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prisila Omungala Ndunyi

Applicant

George Okoth Aswani

Applicant

Gabriel Ocholi Mukoko

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Cancellation of Grant and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the cancellation of the grant and subsequent transfer of land to the respondent should be set aside under section 93 of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent, as a purchaser, acquired valid title to the property despite the cancellation of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the transfer of land parcel Marama/Shiraha/449 to Gabriel Ocholi Mukoko was effected by a person who had been granted representation in Succession Cause No.121 of 1996. The respondent was a purchaser for value. Section 93 of the Law of Succession Act protects such transactions, even if the grant is subsequently revoked or cancelled. Since the applicants did not oppose the application and were properly served, the court was inclined to allow the application and set aside the orders cancelling the grant and the transfer. The court granted the respondent's prayer to set aside the cancellation, thereby restoring his registration as proprietor of the land. No order as to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders cancelling the grant and transfer set aside.

Orders

  • Prayer No.2 of the application is granted, setting aside the orders dated 25.5.98 cancelling the grant and transfer to Gabriel Ocholi Mukoko.
  • No order as to costs.