[2016] KEHC 7317 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7317 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act. Despite the technical breach of section 156(1) regarding placement before the child was declared free for adoption, the court held that the overriding consideration was the best interests of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 7317 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: M M W; Applicant: J W M
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 215 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
AO Muchelule, DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights and Duties
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Rights and Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M M W

Applicant

J W M

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act. Despite the technical breach of section 156(1) regarding placement before the child was declared free for adoption, the court held that the overriding consideration was the best interests of the child. The applicants demonstrated their ability to provide a stable, loving, and supportive environment, and the child had bonded well with them and their biological children. The court also found that the consent of the biological parents could be dispensed with as the child was abandoned and no relatives could be traced. The adoption was therefore granted to serve the best...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants M M W and J W M are allowed to adopt baby P.H., who shall henceforth be known as I J M.
  • The child's date of birth is declared as 22nd July 2013 and he is presumed Kenyan by birth.