[2014] KEHC 2001 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2001 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including the provision of continuous care and custody, and had been positively assessed by the relevant authorities. The child was abandoned at three weeks old, and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2001 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A E M; Applicant: L C W N M; Respondent: J A (to be known as A M)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 19 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
Adoption of Minors, Best Interests of Child, Parental Consent Dispensed, Appointment of Guardian, Local Adoption
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Minors Best Interests of Child Parental Consent Dispensed Appointment of Guardian Local Adoption

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A E M

Applicant

L C W N M

Applicant

J A (to be known as A M)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption of the minor.
  2. 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents is necessary given the abandonment of the child.
  3. 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including the provision of continuous care and custody, and had been positively assessed by the relevant authorities. The child was abandoned at three weeks old, and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful to dispense with their consent. The reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem all confirmed the applicants' suitability and the child's integration into their family. The court concluded that the adoption was in the best interests of the child and allowed the application.

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants A E M and L C W N M are allowed to adopt baby J A, who shall henceforth be known as A M.
  • The child’s date of birth is declared as 16th November 2012 and place of birth as Kajiado, Kenya.