[2009] KEHC 656 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 656 (KLR)

The court found that the omission to register the further charge within the statutory forty-two days was due to inadvertence, not intentional default. The applicant demonstrated that the delay resulted from administrative mishaps at the Lands Registry, including rejection and misplacement of documents. The court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 656 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njowabu Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Children Miscellaneous Application 985 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time for Registration of Further Charge
Outcome
application granted
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Company Charge Registration, Extension of Time, Companies Act Compliance
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Company Charge Registration Extension of Time Companies Act Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njowabu Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time for Registration of Further Charge

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant an extension of time for registration of a further charge under Section 102 of the Companies Act.
  2. 2 Whether the omission to register the further charge within the statutory period was inadvertent and excusable.
  3. 3 Whether granting the extension would prejudice any party.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission to register the further charge within the statutory forty-two days was due to inadvertence, not intentional default. The applicant demonstrated that the delay resulted from administrative mishaps at the Lands Registry, including rejection and misplacement of documents. The court was satisfied that the requirements of Section 102 of the Companies Act were met, and that no party would be prejudiced by granting the extension. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for registration of the further charge by thirty days from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Time for registration of the further charge dated 14th September, 2009 is extended by a period of 30 days from the date of this ruling.