[2016] KEHC 6180 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6180 (KLR)

The court found that since the property in question was registered in the names of both deceased persons as proprietors in common and all beneficiaries had agreed on the distribution, it was just and expedient to consolidate the two estates for purposes of issuing one confirmed grant. This would facilitate the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6180 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kiilu Mwatu Nzomo; Applicant: Julius Muasya Mwatu; Applicant: Sammy Muli Mwatu; Respondent: Regina Kiluu Munyao Mutua; Respondent: Rose Kalondu Munyao Mutua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 41 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Summons for rectification of grant granted; estates consolidated for distribution; costs in the cause.
Judges
EM Muriithi
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Estate Distribution, Consolidation of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Estate Distribution Consolidation of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kiilu Mwatu Nzomo

Applicant

Julius Muasya Mwatu

Applicant

Sammy Muli Mwatu

Applicant

Regina Kiluu Munyao Mutua

Respondent

Rose Kalondu Munyao Mutua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court should rectify the grants to the two estates to enable distribution of the property registered in the names of both deceased persons.
  2. 2 Whether consolidation of the two estates for purposes of issuing one confirmed grant is appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the property in question was registered in the names of both deceased persons as proprietors in common and all beneficiaries had agreed on the distribution, it was just and expedient to consolidate the two estates for purposes of issuing one confirmed grant. This would facilitate the implementation of the agreed distribution and comply with the principles of expeditious disposal of cases. The court therefore granted the summons for rectification of the grants as prayed, with costs in the cause.

Court Disposition

Summons for rectification of grant granted; estates consolidated for distribution; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Summons dated 31st August, 2015 is granted.
  • The two estates are consolidated for purposes of issuance of one confirmed grant for distribution according to the respective shares of the beneficiaries.