[2010] KEHC 2917 (KLR)
The court held that it is not the proper forum to determine ownership of property where there is a dispute, as its jurisdiction in succession matters is limited to administration of the estate and not adjudication of contested property rights. Since the ownership of plot No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2917 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Monica Wanjiru Nganga; Respondent: David Mwangi Ngari
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 40 of 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Discharge of Injunction and Declaration of Property as Part of Estate
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confirmation of Grant, Estate Administration, Declaration of Ownership, Injunction Discharge
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Monica Wanjiru Nganga
Applicant
David Mwangi Ngari
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Discharge of Injunction and Declaration of Property as Part of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plot No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries should be declared part of the deceased's estate and included in the confirmed grant.
- 2 Whether the court in a succession cause can determine ownership of disputed property.
- 3 Whether the injunction order over plot No. 153 should be discharged.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it is not the proper forum to determine ownership of property where there is a dispute, as its jurisdiction in succession matters is limited to administration of the estate and not adjudication of contested property rights. Since the ownership of plot No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries was disputed and had not been resolved prior to confirmation of the grant, and the documents before the court did not conclusively establish the estate's entitlement to the property, the court could not grant the declaration or include the property in the confirmed grant. The applicant was advised to pursue the matter in a civil court, possibly through a declaratory suit, before seeking...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 18th March, 2008 and amended on 22nd July, 2008 is dismissed.
- The applicant is advised to seek determination of ownership in a civil court before seeking amendment of the grant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Succession Cause 40 of 1994
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NG’ANG’A NJOROGE (DECEASED)
R U L I N G
Before me is a Summons dated18th March, 2008and amended on22nd July, 2008filed by Ms. Kanyua Mwaniki & Wainaina advocates for the applicant.The applicant is the administrator named as MONICA WANJIRU NGANGA.The application was said to be filed under Rule 59(i) of the Law of Succession Rules (Cap.160).
The orders sought are as follows-
1. THAT the order of injunction made on11th December, 1995be discharged.
2. THATplot No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries be
declared to be part of the estate of the deceasedas per the grant issued on22nd March, 1994.
3. THAT the said grant be confirmed on its entirety
to include plots No. 153 Kariobangi Light
Industries.
4. THAT the said plot be registered in the name of
the administrators,MONICA WANJIRU NGANGA.
5. The costs of the application be in the cause.
The application was filed with an affidavit sworn by the applicant on
18th March, 2008. It was deposed in the said affidavit, inter alia, that the applicant was appointed administrator of the estate of the later JOSEPH NGANGA NJOROGE on 22nd March, 1994; that on 27th January, 1995 an order was issued against one David Mwangi Ngari restraining him from transferring plot No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries till further orders of the court; that on 11th December, 1995 the grant was confirmed excluding plot.No. 153 Kariobangi Light Industries when Mr. David Mwangi Ngari appeared in court and claimed that he had sold the property to the deceased; that the deponent had learnt that the said David Mwangi Ngari died on16th July, 1999and that in view of his death his claim had abated.There was also a further affidavit sworn on22nd July, 2008filed, in which it was deposed, inter alia, that David Mwangi Ngari did not file any papers to show that the property belonged to him.
The application was not opposed.I would think it would not be opposed because the said David Ngari Mwangi, I am told, died, and there is no evidence that his administrators, if any were served.
I will not grant the orders sought in the application.This is a succession matter in which letters of administration were confirmed on21st June, 1996and amended on21st September, 2004. There appears to have been a dispute on ownership of the said plot No. 153 Light Industries Kariobangi, and on11th December, 1995, the court ruled that the subject property be excluded from the assets of the estate herein.
The documents filed do not show in no uncertain terms that the plot belongs to the herein.This court is not well placed in this succession cause to determine ownership of property.If there is a dispute, as there appears to be the case here on who owns the property, the proper forum is the civil court.This is so especially because that dispute was not sorted out before confirmation of grant.
Consequently, I dismiss the application.The applicant is better advised to proceed in the civil court, even if it is in a declaratory suit to determine the matter before seeking to amend the grant of letters of administration, and registering the plot in her name.This court cannot and is ill equipped to grant the declaration of ownership sought.
The application is therefore dismissed.
Dated atNairobithis 24th day of March, 2010.
GEORGE DULU
JUDGE