[2009] KEHC 109 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 109 (KLR)

The court found that two separate grants had been issued in respect of the same deceased person, based on two different death certificates and succession causes. The Principal Registry confirmed that only one grant should exist for the deceased. Since P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 was filed after P&A Succession...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 109 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nehemiah Cherangut A. Langat; Applicant: James Kibet A. Langat; Respondent: Objector (unnamed)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 62 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Revocation of Grant Suo Moto
Outcome
grant in P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 revoked
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Law of Succession, Duplicate Grants, Probate and Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Law of Succession Duplicate Grants Probate and Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nehemiah Cherangut A. Langat

Applicant

James Kibet A. Langat

Applicant

Objector (unnamed)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Revocation of Grant Suo Moto

  1. 1 Whether the grant issued in P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 should be revoked due to the existence of an earlier grant for the same estate.
  2. 2 Whether the issuance of two grants in respect of the same deceased person was erroneous.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that two separate grants had been issued in respect of the same deceased person, based on two different death certificates and succession causes. The Principal Registry confirmed that only one grant should exist for the deceased. Since P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 was filed after P&A Succession Cause No.7/01, and both parties conceded that the later grant could not stand, the court exercised its power under Rule 44(5) of the Probate and Administration Rules to revoke the subsequent grant. The revocation was necessary to correct the error and ensure that only one valid grant exists for the estate of the deceased.

Court Disposition

grant in P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 revoked

Orders

  • The grant issued in P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 is hereby revoked.
  • The file for P&A Succession Cause No.62/01 is to be closed accordingly.