[2014] KEHC 3737 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3737 (KLR)

The court found that the consent orders of 21st June 1995, which set out the distribution of the estate, had not been opposed and should be implemented. The court granted the prayer for implementation of those orders and authorized the Deputy Registrar to sign relevant documents if the administrator failed or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 3737 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Beneta Alatseka Mukangayi; Respondent: Lubero Mukangayi Mukobole; Applicant: Pandi Atira Mukangayi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 409 of 1988
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Implementation of Consent Orders and Related Reliefs
Outcome
Application partly allowed.
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Life Interest, Distribution of Estate, Consent Orders, Administration of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Confirmation of Grant Life Interest Distribution of Estate Consent Orders Administration of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beneta Alatseka Mukangayi

Petitioner

Lubero Mukangayi Mukobole

Respondent

Pandi Atira Mukangayi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Implementation of Consent Orders and Related Reliefs

  1. 1 Whether the consent orders of 21st June 1995 should be implemented as prayed by the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to cancellation of the respondent's registration as owner of LR. Butsotso/Shikoti/5945 and registration as sole absolute owner.
  3. 3 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be authorized to sign relevant documents for implementation of the court's orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent orders of 21st June 1995, which set out the distribution of the estate, had not been opposed and should be implemented. The court granted the prayer for implementation of those orders and authorized the Deputy Registrar to sign relevant documents if the administrator failed or neglected to do so. The court declined to cancel the respondent's registration and register the applicant as sole absolute owner, holding that such relief could not be granted in succession proceedings as it arose from a separate contract of sale. The court also declined to substitute the applicant for the life interest of Beneta Alatseka Mukangayi, but held that the life interest...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed.

Orders

  • Prayer (b) for implementation of the consent orders of 21st June 1995 is granted.
  • Prayer (d) authorizing the Deputy Registrar to sign relevant documents is granted if the administrator fails or neglects to act.