[2014] KEHC 8264 (KLR)
The court found that the application for setting aside or revocation of the grant did not meet the requirements of Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. There was no evidence or allegation that the grant was obtained fraudulently, by concealment of material facts, or through a defective process. The applicant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8264 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anne Mugure Muinamia; Respondent: George Livingstone Ndungu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1077 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anne Mugure Muinamia
Applicant
George Livingstone Ndungu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application dated 14th November 2012 meets the threshold for revocation or setting aside of the grant under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders for freezing payments from Safaricom Limited regarding Dagoretti/Thogoto/T.296.
- 3 Whether the applicant's grievances should have been raised at the confirmation stage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for setting aside or revocation of the grant did not meet the requirements of Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. There was no evidence or allegation that the grant was obtained fraudulently, by concealment of material facts, or through a defective process. The applicant's grievances related to the distribution of the estate, which should have been raised during the confirmation proceedings. Additionally, the property Dagoretti/Thogoto/T.296 was confirmed not to be part of the estate, rendering the request to freeze payments in respect of it untenable. Consequently, the application was dismissed as misconceived.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 14th November 2012 is dismissed with costs.
- The applicant in the application dated 25th September 2012 is at liberty to fix the same for hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1077 OF 1993
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT MUNGAI GICHINJE – DECEASED
RULING
1. The applications for determination are dated 14th November 2012 and 25th September 2012. The application dated 14th November 2012 seeks revocation of grant while that dated 25th September 2012 seeks that the Deputy Registrar do execute certain documents for the purpose of transmission of the estate.
2. I had directed on 6th February 2013 that the revocation application be resolved first, therefore I shall deal only with the application dated 14th November 2012 leaving that dated 25th September 2012 dealt with on a later date.
3. The application dated 14th November 2012 seeks the setting aside of the grant, that all the beneficiaries be adequately provided for in terms of some proposals made in the supporting affidavit and that payments from Safaricom Limited on account of plot number Dagoretti/Thogoto/T.296 be frozen until further orders.
4. I note that the applicant seeks the setting aside of the grant instead of its revocation. I also note that the applicant is seeking that the estate be distributed in a certain way, yet what is before me is a revocation application and not a confirmation application. I note too that it has been confirmed that Dagoretti/Thogoto/T.296 does not form part of the estate and therefore the orders sought with respect to that property are not available.
5. The deceased died on 12th July 1986. Representation to his estate was sought on 1st August 1993 by Anne Mugure Muinamia and George Livingstone Ndungu. A grant of letters of administration intestate was made to them on 25th January 1994. The grant was confirmed on 19th May 1995 and the estate was shared equally between the two administrators.
6. The issue that the applicant is raising in his application ought to have been raised at the hearing of the confirmation application. If he was unhappy about the confirmation process he ought to have moved the court appropriately.
7. I am not satisfied that that the matters raised in the application dated 14th November 2012 bring it within the provisions of Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. It is not alleged that the process of obtaining the grant was defective and fraudulent nor that there has been lack of diligence in administration.
8. The application dated 14th November 2012 is misconceived. I hereby dismiss the said application with costs. The applicant in the application dated 25th September 2012 is at liberty to fix the same for hearing.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 3rd DAY OF October 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
In the presence of Mr. Nyahena advocate for the respondent.