[2005] KEHC 486 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 486 (KLR)

The High Court held that the application for an injunction pending appeal was without merit because the Succession Act (Cap 160) expressly excludes the application of the Civil Procedure Rules and Act (Cap 21) except where specifically provided. There is no right of appeal from High Court decisions in succession...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KEHC 486 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Swaleh Karama (Estate of); Respondent: Mr. Khatib
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 107 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Injunction Pending Appeal, Succession Procedure, Appeal Rights, Applicability of Civil Procedure, Succession Act Interpretation
Source Language
en
Family and Children Injunction Pending Appeal Succession Procedure Appeal Rights Applicability of Civil Procedure Succession Act Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Swaleh Karama (Estate of)

Applicant

Mr. Khatib

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether an injunction pending appeal can be granted in succession matters under Cap 160.
  2. 2 Whether there is a right of appeal from High Court decisions in succession matters to the Court of Appeal.
  3. 3 Whether Civil Procedure Rules apply to succession proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that the application for an injunction pending appeal was without merit because the Succession Act (Cap 160) expressly excludes the application of the Civil Procedure Rules and Act (Cap 21) except where specifically provided. There is no right of appeal from High Court decisions in succession matters unless expressly allowed by statute, and the Parliament did not intend for such matters to reach the Court of Appeal. Therefore, the applicant could not rely on the Civil Procedure Rules to seek an injunction, and any such relief should be sought under the Court of Appeal Rules. The application was thus dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 28/6/05 is dismissed with costs.