[2014] KEHC 3114 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was the only person who had come forward to administer the estate, that proper notice had been given through gazettement, and that no objections had been filed by any other potential heirs or creditors. The applicant's status as a great grandchild and the confirmation by community...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 3114 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rahim Mansurali Hassaawali Dharani; Respondent: Vasanji Ramji Kanji Dharani (Deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 66 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- application for confirmation of grant allowed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Intestate Estate, Heir Identification
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rahim Mansurali Hassaawali Dharani
Applicant
Vasanji Ramji Kanji Dharani (Deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to confirmation of grant as the sole surviving relative of the deceased.
- 2 Whether due notice was given to potential heirs and creditors as required by law.
- 3 Whether the absence of objections to the grant justifies confirmation of the grant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was the only person who had come forward to administer the estate, that proper notice had been given through gazettement, and that no objections had been filed by any other potential heirs or creditors. The applicant's status as a great grandchild and the confirmation by community leaders were accepted as sufficient evidence of his entitlement. The court was satisfied that all procedural requirements had been met and that there was no legal basis to decline the application for confirmation of grant. Accordingly, the application was allowed as prayed.
Court Disposition
application for confirmation of grant allowed
Orders
- The summons for confirmation of grant dated 30th January 2012 is allowed as prayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 66 OF 2011
IN THE ESTATE OF VASANJI RAMJI KANJI DHARANI – (DECEASED)
RULING
1. What is pending for determination in this cause is the summons for confirmation of grant dated 30th January 2012.
2. The cause relates to the estate of Vassanji Ramji who died on 3rd May 1967. Representation to his estate was sought on 18th January 2011 by the applicant herein, Rahim Mansurali Hassaawali Dharani in his capacity as great grandchild of the deceased, there being no other closer blood relations of the deceased. There is a letter of identification dated 15th November 2010 forwarded to court by Aga Khan Shia Imami Ismaili Council of Kisumu to that effect.
3. A grant of letters of administration intestate was made to the petitioner on 22nd July 2011 and a certificate was issued on the same day in his name.
4. On 20th March 2012, the administrator moved the court by way of summons for confirmation of grant dated 30th January 2012 seeking to have the grant dated 22nd January 2011 confirmed.
5. The application was placed before Mugo J. on 9th May 2012, who was not satisfied that the administrator was the sole surviving heir of the deceased and called for further evidence.
6. On 13th June 2012 the administrator filed an affidavit sworn on 8th June 2012 in England. He concedes in the said affidavit that the deceased did indeed have children, but that their whereabouts were not known. It transpired that the deceased initially came from India.
7. When the said affidavit was placed before Mugo J. on 9th July 2012, she directed the administrator to file written submissions.
8. The administrator filed submissions on 14th August 2012. His principal argument is that he is the sole surviving relative of the deceased as confirmed by the leaders of his community.
9. I have noted that notice of the filing of the petition for grant of letters of administration was gazetted on 17th June 2011. The object of gazettment is to inform the world that the deceased is no more and representation to his estate was being sought. This information is meant for the consumption of creditors of the deceased and heirs. The notice invites objections to the grant being made to the petitioner. I note that no objections were have filed at all and it was on that basis that grant was made to the administrator/applicant.
10. In view of the above I do not find basis upon which I can decline the application. The same is allowed as prayed.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 28th DAY OF August, 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
In the presence of Mr. Nyoike advocate for the applicant.