[2020] KEHC 8884 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8884 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants are suitable persons to adopt the minor, having been married for a substantial period, financially stable, and having fostered the child since 2014. The statutory requirements for adoption were met, including the valid consent of the biological parents, who offered the child for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8884 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: PMM; Applicant: ANM; Guardian Ad Litem: BMM; Legal Guardian: TMM; Respondent: Director of Children Services
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 6 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Final Ruling
Outcome
adoption_granted
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Consent, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Child Welfare Parental Consent Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PMM

Applicant

ANM

Applicant

BMM

Guardian Ad Litem

TMM

Legal Guardian

Director of Children Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Final Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are suitable persons to adopt the minor TO.
  2. 2 Whether the statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001 have been met.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents has been validly obtained and if waiver of statutory requirements is necessary.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants are suitable persons to adopt the minor, having been married for a substantial period, financially stable, and having fostered the child since 2014. The statutory requirements for adoption were met, including the valid consent of the biological parents, who offered the child for adoption due to the circumstances of his birth. The child was declared free for adoption, and all relevant reports from the Children Welfare Society of Kenya and the Sub-County Children’s Officer were favorable. The court held that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, who would benefit from the care and stability provided by the applicants. There was no necessity...

Court Disposition

adoption_granted

Orders

  • The applicants are authorized to adopt TO-MINOR, who shall be known as EMM.
  • TMM is appointed as the Legal Guardian of the child.