[2018] KEHC 9025 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9025 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as the child’s grandparents, had demonstrated their ability to provide a stable, loving, and supportive environment for the child, who had been under their care since the death of his parents. The statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001, were satisfied,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 9025 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: R M N; Applicant: F N M
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 53 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
AO Muchelule, REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Consent Requirements
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Rights Consent Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R M N

Applicant

F N M

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
  2. 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child V K K to be adopted by the applicants.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents is required given their demise.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as the child’s grandparents, had demonstrated their ability to provide a stable, loving, and supportive environment for the child, who had been under their care since the death of his parents. The statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001, were satisfied, including the declaration of the child as free for adoption, the suitability of the applicants as confirmed by the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children Services, and the consents of the applicants’ other children. The court held that the best interests of the child would be served by granting the adoption, and that the consent of the biological parents was not required...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants R M N and F N M are allowed to adopt child V K K.
  • Child V K K shall henceforth be known as V K M.