[2007] KEHC 758 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fostered VT for three years, demonstrated love and commitment, and provided a stable home. The child was abandoned and no biological parent had come forward. All statutory reports supported the adoption. The court held that the best interests of the child would be served by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 758 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: HMM; Applicant: RMM; Respondent: Director of Children’s Services
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 85 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- JA Aluoch
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Children, Abandoned Children, Parental Consent Waiver
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HMM
Applicant
RMM
Applicant
Director of Children’s Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements to adopt the child VT.
- 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fostered VT for three years, demonstrated love and commitment, and provided a stable home. The child was abandoned and no biological parent had come forward. All statutory reports supported the adoption. The court held that the best interests of the child would be served by granting the adoption and that the consent of the biological parents could be lawfully dispensed with due to abandonment. The adoption would cement the existing parent-child relationship and provide the child with a permanent, loving family.
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicants HMM and RMM are authorized to adopt VT.
- The consent of the biological parents is dispensed with due to abandonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF VT (CHILD)
RULING
HMM and his wife RMM applied to court to adopt VT, a child who was found abandoned and placed under the care of the “Nest Children’s Home”, from where the applicants fostered him about 3 years ago.
The court appointed a “guardian ad litem” who subsequently filed a report, which I have read and considered.
A home study report was also prepared by Kenya Christian Homes, who also issued a certificate, “freeing the child for adoption”.
An investigative report was filed by the Director of Children’s Services. It gives the brief background as well as the child. It also gives reasons for adoption by the couple, who due to medical complications have not been able to have children of their own.
In court during the hearing, I interviewed both applicants briefly. The 1st applicant HMM, testified that they fell in love with the baby the 1st day they saw him, and they have accepted and bonded with him. They have opened a children’s account for him, and also confirm that the child will inherit from them.
RMM, the second applicant confessed that there was emptiness in her life until they started fostering this baby. She now feels fulfilled and promised to look after him as her child.
I observed the applicants in court, as they gave evidence and I was satisfied that they love the child, and want to be parents to him as if he was their biological child. After all, they have fostered the child for about 3 years now, and have even started fostering a second child, whom they hope to adopt to keep VT company.
As VT was an abandoned child I hereby dispense with the consent of their biological parents who have not come forth to claim him.
The child has found a home with parents who love him. I therefore find no reason to interfere with him, but instead move to cement the relationship he already has with his “parents” by authorizing them to adopt him, I so order.
I direct the Registrar of Births to issue Vincent with the relevant Certificate of Birth reflecting his names as VMM
Dated at Nairobi this 28th day of September, 2007.
JOYCE ALUOCH
JUDGE