[2023] KEHC 3565 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3565 (KLR)

The court found that the present application was identical in parties, subject matter, and prayers to an earlier application (High Court Family Misc Succession Cause E002/2022) which had already been heard and determined. The applicants failed to follow the directions previously issued by the court and instead filed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3565 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pius Paul Onyango & another
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Naivasha
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration E006 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Duplicate Succession Cause
Outcome
Application struck out as an abuse of process and for want of jurisdiction (functus officio).
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Functus Officio, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Functus Officio Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pius Paul Onyango & another

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Duplicate Succession Cause

  1. 1 Whether the present application is res judicata due to a prior determination of an identical application.
  2. 2 Whether the filing of the present application constitutes an abuse of the court process.
  3. 3 Whether the court is functus officio in respect of the subject matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present application was identical in parties, subject matter, and prayers to an earlier application (High Court Family Misc Succession Cause E002/2022) which had already been heard and determined. The applicants failed to follow the directions previously issued by the court and instead filed a duplicative application. The court held that it was functus officio, having already rendered a decision on the matter, and that the present application amounted to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the application was struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as an abuse of process and for want of jurisdiction (functus officio).

Orders

  • The application dated July 10, 2022 is struck out.
  • No further orders are made.