[2008] KEHC 2582 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, SMW and NWM, have provided a loving and stable home for the child XK for approximately six years. All statutory reports from the Director of Children Services, the Guardian ad litem, and the Little Angels Network recommended the adoption. The court determined that refusing the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2582 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: SMW; Applicant: NWM; Plaintiff: XK aka EBW; Defendant: MR & MRS S M W
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 62 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DA Onyancha
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Child Welfare
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SMW
Applicant
NWM
Applicant
XK aka EBW
Plaintiff
MR & MRS S M W
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be authorized to adopt the child XK.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, SMW and NWM, have provided a loving and stable home for the child XK for approximately six years. All statutory reports from the Director of Children Services, the Guardian ad litem, and the Little Angels Network recommended the adoption. The court determined that refusing the adoption would not serve the best interests of the child, as it would result in the child being returned to a children's home, depriving her of the only family she knows. The applicants have demonstrated their ability to provide for the child's emotional, educational, and social needs. Therefore, the adoption is authorized in accordance with the best interests of the child...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicants SMW and NWM are hereby authorized to forthwith adopt Baby XK whose name will be EBW.
- The Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption in his Register of Adoptions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Adoption Cause 62 of 2007
X K aka E B W.................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MR & MRS S M W.....................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The Applicants in this application seeking authority to adopt are SMW and his wife NWM. They are both Kenyans. They earn a monthly sum of about 38,000/- both as employees and from rentals of houses. They have never been lucky to get a child of their own. This is their first application for adoption.
The child applied to be adopted is called XK. He was born about 7 years ago by a schoolgirl whose pregnancy originated from a cousin in Western Province in Luhyia land. It is still a taboo for a cousin to father a child, with a cousin woman. This having happened in this case, it had become necessary to send away the child to the nearest Children’s Home. In this case the child was sent to New Life Home at Kisumu but later transferred to New Life Nairobi. There is where the Applicants first contacted the child.
There are three reports made about the issue of adoption of the child after investigations. They include: -
(a) The Director of Children Services.
(b) The Guardian ad litem
(c) The little Angels Network.
I have examined the reports. They all recommend that the child be adopted by the applicants who in any case have fostered the child for about six years. The child presently knows them as the only parents she has and may not even know that she was given for adoption. The parents, from the reports love and care about the child. They have no any other child. It is my view therefore that they value him sufficiently to wish to adopt him.
It is my further view that if I refuse to authorize the intended adoption, the result would be to have the child returned to a Children’s Home. That would not be in the best interest of the child. The Applicants on the other hand have offered the child a sure home and prospects for an education and other social amenities commensurate with their standard of living.
For the above reasons I will allow this application in the following orders: -
ORDERS
1. The applicants SMW and NWM are hereby authorized to forthwith adopt Baby XK whose name will be EBW.
2. The Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption is his Register of Adoptions.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of May, 2008.
……………………………………
D A ONYANCHA
JUDGE