[2003] KEHC 2 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 2 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of LR No: 209/9754/8 from the certificate of grant was not due to an error as contemplated by Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, but rather due to the fact that the asset's existence was unknown at the time of confirmation. As such, rectification was not the appropriate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] KEHC 2 (KLR)
Parties
MISSING: Samson Mwenja Komo (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 915 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification/review of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed in part; confirmation orders reviewed; fresh certificate of grant to issue including omitted asset.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Review of Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Review of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Mwenja Komo (Deceased)

MISSING

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification/review of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the omission of LR No: 209/9754/8 from the certificate of grant can be rectified under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appropriate remedy is rectification or review of the confirmation order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of LR No: 209/9754/8 from the certificate of grant was not due to an error as contemplated by Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, but rather due to the fact that the asset's existence was unknown at the time of confirmation. As such, rectification was not the appropriate remedy. Instead, the court determined that the proper course was to review the confirmation orders made on 18th February 2004 and 12th November 2007, and to issue a fresh certificate of grant to the administrators reflecting the newly discovered asset. This approach ensures that all assets of the deceased are properly accounted for and distributed in accordance with the law.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; confirmation orders reviewed; fresh certificate of grant to issue including omitted asset.

Orders

  • The confirmation orders made on 18th February 2004 and 12th November 2007 are reviewed.
  • A fresh certificate of grant shall issue to the administrators reflecting LR No. 209/9754/8 as one of the assets.