[2021] KEHC 9821 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9821 (KLR)

The court held that the statutory six-month waiting period for confirmation of a grant is designed to protect the interests of potential objectors and beneficiaries by providing them with an opportunity to challenge the grant or the will. The discretion to confirm a grant before six months should be exercised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9821 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Harry Buckle; Applicant: Stephanie Moya Turnbull; Applicant: Stewart Saunders (deceased); Applicant: Slee Blackwell (renounced)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E012 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Early Confirmation of Grant of Probate
Outcome
application for early confirmation of grant rejected
Judges
JN Onyiego
Legal Topics
Probate Confirmation, Early Confirmation of Grant, Absence of Dependants, Resealing of Grant, Will Execution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Probate Confirmation Early Confirmation of Grant Absence of Dependants Resealing of Grant Will Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Harry Buckle

Applicant

Stephanie Moya Turnbull

Applicant

Stewart Saunders (deceased)

Applicant

Slee Blackwell (renounced)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Early Confirmation of Grant of Probate

  1. 1 Whether the court should confirm the grant of probate before the expiry of six months as provided under Section 71(3) of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of dependants and the need for resealing in the United Kingdom constitute sufficient grounds for early confirmation of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the statutory six-month waiting period for confirmation of a grant is designed to protect the interests of potential objectors and beneficiaries by providing them with an opportunity to challenge the grant or the will. The discretion to confirm a grant before six months should be exercised sparingly and only in extremely deserving cases. In this matter, the court found no urgency or expediency justifying early confirmation, especially since there are other named beneficiaries who should be notified and given an opportunity to participate. The need for resealing in the United Kingdom does not constitute sufficient urgency, as there is no time limitation for resealing....

Court Disposition

application for early confirmation of grant rejected

Orders

  • Application for confirmation of grant before expiry of six months is rejected.
  • Applicants to apply for confirmation of the grant when the time is ripe.