[2014] KEHC 5505 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5505 (KLR)

The court determined that since the proceeds from Mwimbi Mungano Investment Ltd had already been distributed among the widow and sons, it would be impractical to require a refund. The ancestral land, Loc. 14/Kirui/1601, should remain with the widow and sons. The remaining assets, specifically Dandora Plot T 58...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 5505 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jacinta Nyambura Muraya; Applicant: John Wangai Muraya; Applicant: Peter Macharia Muraya; Applicant: James Waweru Muraya; Respondent: Lucy Njeri Chege; Respondent: Annastasia Muthoni Muraya; Respondent: Mary Wanjiku Ngomo; Respondent: Joyce Nduta Muraya; Respondent: Grace Wangai Muraya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 783 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application for confirmation of grant allowed with specified mode of distribution.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Intestate Succession
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Intestate Succession

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacinta Nyambura Muraya

Applicant

John Wangai Muraya

Applicant

Peter Macharia Muraya

Applicant

James Waweru Muraya

Applicant

Lucy Njeri Chege

Respondent

Annastasia Muthoni Muraya

Respondent

Mary Wanjiku Ngomo

Respondent

Joyce Nduta Muraya

Respondent

Grace Wangai Muraya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 How should the estate of Samuel Muraya (deceased) be distributed among the beneficiaries?
  2. 2 Whether the shares in Akuisi Farmers Company Ltd should be included in the distribution despite uncertainty about their existence.
  3. 3 Whether previously distributed assets should be refunded or retained by the recipients.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that since the proceeds from Mwimbi Mungano Investment Ltd had already been distributed among the widow and sons, it would be impractical to require a refund. The ancestral land, Loc. 14/Kirui/1601, should remain with the widow and sons. The remaining assets, specifically Dandora Plot T 58 Muoroto and the shares in Akuisi Farmers Company Ltd, should be distributed among the daughters, who had not benefited from the previous distribution. The court also acknowledged the uncertainty regarding the existence of the Akuisi Farmers Company Ltd shares but ordered their distribution among the daughters should they be found to exist. The orders were made to ensure fairness and...

Court Disposition

Application for confirmation of grant allowed with specified mode of distribution.

Orders

  • The application dated 19th July 2011 is hereby confirmed.
  • Loc. 14/Kirui/1601 shall be shared equally between Jacinta Nyambura Muraya, John Wangai Muraya, Peter Macharia Muraya and James Waweru Muraya.