[2013] KEHC 3832 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3832 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had fully complied with all statutory requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law, including approval by the National Adoption Committee and the relevant Swedish authorities. The applicants had custody of the child for the requisite period, demonstrated the ability to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3832 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: K.M.T.; Applicant: L.K.T.
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 27 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Final Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Legal Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Rights Legal Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K.M.T.

Applicant

L.K.T.

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants have been properly approved by both Kenyan and Swedish authorities for adoption.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had fully complied with all statutory requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law, including approval by the National Adoption Committee and the relevant Swedish authorities. The applicants had custody of the child for the requisite period, demonstrated the ability to provide for the child, and undertook to comply with post-adoption supervision requirements. The child was declared free for adoption, and the consent of relatives was properly dispensed with due to the circumstances of abandonment and inability to trace relatives. The adoption was determined to be in the best interests of the child, and all procedural and substantive legal...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants, K.M.T. and L.K.T., are authorized to adopt baby J.M.M., who shall henceforth be known as J.M.T.
  • A.T. and T.A.A.T. are appointed as legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants.