[2014] KEHC 8442 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 8442 (KLR)

The court found that the consent order of 2nd December 2011, which allowed the applicant to withdraw Kshs.250,000 from the deceased's account for maintenance, fully compromised and disposed of the pending application for monthly withdrawals. There was no indication in the consent that the order was interim or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 8442 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Emmah Wanjiru Kibara; Respondent: John Kinyanjui Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1618 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interim Application for Maintenance Pending Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application dated 23rd August 2011 deemed compromised and disposed of by consent order; no further orders granted.
Judges
AO Muchelule
Legal Topics
Succession, Maintenance of Dependants, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Maintenance of Dependants Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmah Wanjiru Kibara

Applicant

John Kinyanjui Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Interim Application for Maintenance Pending Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be allowed to withdraw a monthly sum from the deceased's accounts for her and her children's upkeep pending confirmation of grant.
  2. 2 Whether the consent order allowing a one-off withdrawal compromised the pending application for monthly maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent order of 2nd December 2011, which allowed the applicant to withdraw Kshs.250,000 from the deceased's account for maintenance, fully compromised and disposed of the pending application for monthly withdrawals. There was no indication in the consent that the order was interim or subject to further hearing. Therefore, the application dated 23rd August 2011 required no further determination. The only remaining issues were the confirmation of grant and the determination of dependency for the deceased's parents, which should proceed expeditiously.

Court Disposition

Application dated 23rd August 2011 deemed compromised and disposed of by consent order; no further orders granted.

Orders

  • The application dated 23rd August 2011 is deemed dealt with and requires no further hearing.
  • No order as to costs.