Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nyahururu

In the matter of James Mwangi Ndung’u (Deceased) [2021] KEHC 4533 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicant had established, on a balance of probabilities, that James Mwangi Ndung’u had disappeared on 12/08/2012 and had not been heard from for over seven years by those who would be expected to hear from him if he were alive. The applicant provided credible evidence, including a police report, media announcements, and confirmation from the local chief, to support her claim. The court applied Section 118A of the Evidence Act, which creates a rebuttable presumption of death in such circumstances. As there was no evidence to the contrary and the statutory requirements were met, the court declared James Mwangi Ndung’u presumed dead and directed the Registrar of Births and Deaths to register his death and issue a death certificate.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • A declaration is hereby made that James Mwangi Ndung’u is presumed dead.
  • The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to enter the name of James Mwangi Ndung’u in the register of deaths and issue a death certificate thereof.
  • No orders as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Irene Njeri Wangari

Applicant

Registrar of Births and Deaths

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that James Mwangi Ndung’u disappeared on 12/08/2012, has not been seen or heard from since, and all reasonable efforts to trace him, including police reports and media announcements, have failed. She relied on Section 118A of the Evidence Act, which allows for a presumption of death after seven years of unexplained absence. Supporting affidavits and documentary evidence were provided to establish the period of disappearance and the applicant’s relationship to the missing person.
Respondent
The Registrar of Births and Deaths did not file any opposition or appear in court to contest the application. No contrary evidence or arguments were presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 118A, Evidence Act (Cap 80, Laws of Kenya)

    A person not heard of for seven years by those expected to have heard from him is presumed dead.

  2. 02

    Section 118A, Evidence Act (Cap 80, Laws of Kenya)

    The burden of proof is on the applicant to establish disappearance and lack of communication for the statutory period.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established, on a balance of probabilities, that James Mwangi Ndung’u had disappeared on 12/08/2012 and had not been heard from for over seven years by those who would be expected to hear from him if he were alive. The applicant provided credible evidence, including a police report, media announcements, and confirmation from the local chief, to support her claim. The court applied Section 118A of the Evidence Act, which creates a rebuttable presumption of death in such circumstances. As there was no evidence to the contrary and the statutory requirements were met, the court declared James Mwangi Ndung’u presumed dead and directed the Registrar of Births and Deaths to register his death and issue a death certificate.

Obiter and limits

  • The court noted that applications of this nature are anchored on the need to provide legal closure for families of missing persons.
  • No orders as to costs were made, recognizing the sensitive nature of the proceedings.

Court disposition

application granted

  • A declaration is hereby made that James Mwangi Ndung’u is presumed dead.
  • The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to enter the name of James Mwangi Ndung’u in the register of deaths and issue a death certificate thereof.
  • No orders as to costs.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2021] KEHC 4533 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAHURURU

MISC. CIVIL CASE NO. 78 OF 2019 (OS)

IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 118A OF THE EVIDENCE ACT CAP 80 LAWS OF KENYA

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY IRENE NJERI WANGARI – APPLICANT

AND

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES MWANGI NDUNG’U (DECEASED)

JUDGMENT

1. By originating summons dated 09/09/2019, the Plaintiff Irene Njeri Wangari sought reliefs;

a. That a declaration be made that James Mwangi Ndung’u dead.

b. And that the Registrar of Births and Deaths be directed to enter the name of James Mwangi Ndung’u in register of deaths and issue death certificate thereof.

2. The same Originating Summons is supported by the grounds that the subject herein went missing on 12/08/2012 and to date his whereabouts are unknown.

3. He left behind the wife instant Plaintiff and 2 issues of the marriage borne out of Customary Law.

4. Thus the Plaintiff seeks presumption of his death by dint of his disappearance for a period exceeding 7 years.

5. This court is moved via the provisions of Section 118A of Evidence Act Cap. 80 Evidence Act Laws of Kenya.

6. The Originating summons is supported by the affidavit of the Plaintiff sworn on 09/09/2019 reiterating the said grounds on the face of the Originating Summons.

7. When matter came for hearing on 26/07/2021, the Plaintiff testified as PW3 and confirmed that on 12/08/2012, her husband subject herein received a call from people unknown to her and they told him they had arrived in a place called Tank and he left to meet them.

8. In the evening of the same day, his phone went off and he has never been seen to date nor heard of his whereabouts.

9. The Plaintiff reported his disappearance on 14/08/2012 at Nyahururu Police Station and as a proof of the said report, PW1 Deputy OCS Nyahururu Police Station produced an OB Abstract P-Exhibit 1 of the same date of report.

10. The Plaintiff also did pay for media announcement of the subject disappearance via Royal Media via Inooro and to date, no information has ever emerged of his whereabouts. The extract of report announced and the receipts of payments were produced as Exhibit 4 (a) and (b).

11. PW2 Senior Chief Nyahururu produced a letter she wrote to confirm the Plaintiff is the surviving wife of the said James Mwangi Ndung’u, and same was marked P-Exhibit 3.

12. An application of this nature is anchored undersection 118A of the Evidence Actwhich provides as follows:

“Where it is proved that a person has not been heard of or seen for seven years by those who might be expected to have heard of him if he was alive, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that he is dead.”

13. Thus Section118A Evidence Act, Cap. 80 Laws of Kenyaeffect is that the person sought to be presumed dead must have disappeared for 7 years and that his whereabouts is unknown for the same period of 7 years.

14. In the instant situation, it has been established on balance of probabilities via the testimonies of PW1 Deputy OCS Nyahururu Police Station, The Senior Chief Nyahururu Police Station and the Plaintiff, that the subject disappearance by date of this judgment 9 years and by 09/09/2019, when this matter was lodged in court, over 7 years had lapsed and the subject’s whereabouts was unknown since 12/08/2012.

15. Thus the court finds that the Plaintiff has proved her case on balance of probabilities and thus court makes the following orders;

i. A declaration be and is hereby made to the effect that James Mwangi Ndung’u is presumed dead.

ii. And that the Registrar of Births and Deaths be and is hereby directed to enter the name of James Mwangi Ndung’u in register of deaths and issue death certificate thereof.

iii. No orders as to costs.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYAHURURU THIS 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2021.

………………………………..

CHARLES KARIUKI

JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Evidence Act (Cap 80) Section 118A

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.