[2022] KEHC 10274 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10274 (KLR)

The court held that while the applicant has an arguable case for the remand period to be considered in his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, it cannot exercise its discretion or grant the relief sought without first reviewing the trial and appellate records. The court therefore directed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10274 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Oscar Ingotsi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E014 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Outcome
Interim orders issued; application deferred pending production of records.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Sentencing Review, Remand Period Credit, Robbery With Violence, Death Penalty Commutation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Review Remand Period Credit Robbery With Violence Death Penalty Commutation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oscar Ingotsi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody considered in the computation of his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the court can exercise discretion to grant the relief sought without access to the trial and appellate records.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while the applicant has an arguable case for the remand period to be considered in his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, it cannot exercise its discretion or grant the relief sought without first reviewing the trial and appellate records. The court therefore directed the Deputy Registrar to call for the relevant records from the trial court and appellate courts before making a substantive determination on the application.

Court Disposition

Interim orders issued; application deferred pending production of records.

Orders

  • Deputy Registrar to call for the trial records in Kakamega CMCRCC No. 1401 of 2008 and judgments in Kakamega HCCRA No. 84 of 2009 and Kisumu CACRA No. 109 of 2016.
  • Matter to be mentioned on 28th July 2022.