[2022] KEHC 12911 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12911 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's order suspending the applicant's bank accounts for 90 days was not sought in the application before the magistrate and was therefore an illegality. The High Court held that it has jurisdiction to revise such orders under sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12911 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Inland Africa Logistics Ltd; Respondent: Republic (Through the Banking Fraud Investigation Unit (BFIU)); Respondent: Chief Magistrate's Court at Mombasa; Respondent: I&M Bank; Respondent: NCBA Bank Nkrumah Branch, Mombasa; Interested Party: Bwanyange Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Revision 170 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application allowed in part; order suspending bank accounts lifted; no order as to costs
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Bank Account Freezing Orders, Criminal Investigations, Judicial Review of Magistrate Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Banking and Finance Bank Account Freezing Orders Criminal Investigations Judicial Review of Magistrate Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Inland Africa Logistics Ltd

Applicant

Republic (Through the Banking Fraud Investigation Unit (BFIU))

Respondent

Chief Magistrate's Court at Mombasa

Respondent

I&M Bank

Respondent

NCBA Bank Nkrumah Branch, Mombasa

Respondent

Bwanyange Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the trial magistrate had jurisdiction to order suspension of the applicant's bank accounts for 90 days without a specific prayer for such suspension.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over the orders of the subordinate court in this context.
  3. 3 Whether procedural technicalities regarding company authorization should defeat the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's order suspending the applicant's bank accounts for 90 days was not sought in the application before the magistrate and was therefore an illegality. The High Court held that it has jurisdiction to revise such orders under sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 165(6) of the Constitution. The preliminary objection based on the Government Proceedings Act was dismissed as inapplicable, since the applicant was not making a claim against the government but seeking revision of a subordinate court's order. The court also held that the absence of a formal company resolution did not defeat the application, as the director's...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part; order suspending bank accounts lifted; no order as to costs

Orders

  • The order suspending the operations of account NCBA Bank KES 1915150058 and I & M Bank USD xxxxxxxx is lifted.
  • No order as to costs.