[2020] KEELC 3103 (KLR)
The court found that the failure to compile the record of appeal and expedite the hearing of the appeal could not be attributed to the appellant, as the delay was due to the lower court file not being forwarded despite repeated requests by both the court and the appellant. The judge held that the application to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 3103 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Inoi Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd; Respondent: Kaitheri Housing Co-operative Society
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 17 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeals From Tribunal, Record of Appeal Requirements, Delay in Forwarding Court File
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inoi Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd
Applicant
Kaitheri Housing Co-operative Society
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to delay in setting it down for hearing.
- 2 Whether the delay in prosecuting the appeal is attributable to the appellant or to administrative delays in forwarding the lower court file.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the failure to compile the record of appeal and expedite the hearing of the appeal could not be attributed to the appellant, as the delay was due to the lower court file not being forwarded despite repeated requests by both the court and the appellant. The judge held that the application to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution was premature because the appeal had not yet been admitted for hearing, and the necessary documents from the lower court had not been availed. The court emphasized that the law requires a judge to peruse the original file from the subordinate court before admitting an appeal, and this process had not been completed due to administrative...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 6th June 2018 is dismissed.
- Costs to be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KERUGOYA
ELCA CASE NO. 17 OF 2016
INOI FARMERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.............APPLICANT
VERSUS
KAITHERI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY.......RESPONDENT
RULING
The application before me is the Chamber Summons dated 6th June 2018 brought under Order 42 Rule 35 CPR and Section 79B of the Civil Procedure Act. The Applicant seeks an order that the Appellants Appeal herein be dismissed for want of prosecution. The application is supported by the affidavit of John Ndana Advocate and grounds reflected on the face of the said application. According to the Applicant, the Appellants herein filed Memorandum of Appeal on 17th November 2016 and served it upon their advocates. However, the Appellant/Respondent never took any steps to set down the appeal for hearing. He stated that the Appellant/Respondent has not even prepared the Record of Appeal which is a clear indication that they do not have interest to prosecute the appeal herein. He stated that the appeal herein was only filed to delay the Respondent from enjoying the fruits of its judgment in the lower Court.
In reply to that application, the Appellant/Respondent filed a replying affidavit opposing the same and stated that following the filing of their Memorandum of Appeal on 17th November 2016, they also filed an application for injunction pending appeal on 1st December 2016 which application was allowed on 6th October 2017. According to the Appellant/Respondent, the Court in allowing the application for injunction on 6th October 2017 ordered the Deputy Registrar to call for the lower Court file so as to expedite the appeal. She attached a copy of the said letter dated 17th November 2017. The Respondent further stated that since then, the file has not been forwarded by the lower Court as she has also personally followed the tribunal file to no avail. The Appellant also stated that the tribunal file has been active in that on 22nd February 2017, the Applicant/Respondent herein raised their Bill of costs which was taxed on 6th October 2017. She also argued that on 1st September 2017, the Respondent herein filed Notice to show cause on execution of the taxed costs. On 7th November 2017, the Appellant filed an application for stay of execution which is still pending before the tribunal and that could explain the reason why the file has not been forwarded from the Tribunal to this Honourable Court. The Appellant stated that failure to set down the appeal for hearing cannot be her fault but has been caused by the delay in getting the typed proceedings and also having the lower Court file availed to this Honourable Court. The Appellant argued that the application is pre-mature as the appeal has not been admitted for hearing though she has filed Record of Appeal.
DISPOSITION
I have considered the affidavit evidence and the submissions by the parties. I have also considered the applicable law. Section 79 B of the Civil Procedure Act provides as follows:
“Before an appeal from a subordinate Court to the High Court is heard, a Judge of the High Court shall peruse it, and if he considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering with the decree, part of a decree or order appealed against, he may, notwithstanding Section 79 C, reject the appeal summarily”.
The law is categorical that before an appeal from the lower Court to the High Court and by extension Courts of equal status, a Judge must go through the same and make a determination whether to admit it or not. The Judge can only make that determination after perusing through the original file from the subordinate Court. From the Court record, the Deputy Registrar of this Honourable Court on 7th November 2017 wrote to the Chief Magistrate reminding him of a letter he had written on 18th October 2016 calling for the lower Court file to be forwarded to expedite this appeal. The Appellant also attached a copy of a letter to the Executive officer, Co-operative Tribunal dated 26th October 2016 requesting to be supplied with certified copies of the judgment and proceedings in Case No. 10 of 2011 for the purposes of lodging an appeal. That letter was acknowledged by the Co-operative Tribunal on 19th October 2016. The Appellant also annexed a copy of an official receipt. From these annextures and explanations given by the Appellant, it is clear in my mind that failure to compile a Record of Appeal and expedite the hearing of this Appeal cannot be attributed to the Appellant in any event. I agree with the submissions by counsel for the Appellant that this application is pre-mature as the Appeal has not even been admitted. In the upshot, the application dated 6th June 2018 is hereby dismissed with costs to be in the cause.
READ, DELIVERED and SIGNED in open Court at Kerugoya this21st day of February, 2020.
…………………….……….
E.C. CHERONO
ELC JUDGE, KERUGOYA
21ST FEBRUARY, 2020
In the presence of:
1. Mr. Ndana for Respondent
2. Mr. Waweru Macharia holding brief for Ms Wangechi Munene