[2000] KEHC 444 (KLR)
The court exercised its discretion to set aside the ex parte judgment on the basis that the interests of justice required the defendant to be given an opportunity to file its defence and be heard on merit. The court found that the reasons advanced by the defendant for the delay were sufficient and that no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KEHC 444 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Insteel Limited; Defendant: Industrial Plant (E.A.) Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1740 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed; ex parte judgment set aside
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Late Filing of Defence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Insteel Limited
Plaintiff
Industrial Plant (E.A.) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex parte judgment entered against the defendant should be set aside.
- 2 Whether the defendant has provided sufficient reason for failing to file a defence in time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to set aside the ex parte judgment on the basis that the interests of justice required the defendant to be given an opportunity to file its defence and be heard on merit. The court found that the reasons advanced by the defendant for the delay were sufficient and that no irreparable prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff if the judgment was set aside, provided the defendant paid the costs of the application and filed its defence within the stipulated period.
Court Disposition
application allowed; ex parte judgment set aside
Orders
- The ex parte judgment entered on 24-1-2000 is set aside.
- The defendant shall file the defence within 14 days of the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1740 OF 1999 INSTEEL LIMITED……………………………………………..….PLAINTIFF -VERSUS INDUSTRIAL PLAINT (E.A.) LTD……………………………..DEFENDANT RULING The defendant/applicant is asking the Court to set aside the Ex Parte Judgment and it has given its reasons why the Defence was not filed in time in the Affidavit of Agnes Muchemi. The Application is opposed on the Grounds that the Judgment was properly entered when appearance and Defence were not filed in time. In the greater interest of justice I will allow the application. The Ex Parte Judgment entered on 24-1-2000 is hereby set aside. The Defendant shall file the Defence within 14 days of to-days date and shall pay to the Respondent the cost of this application before filing the Defence. Delivered at Nairobi this 11th day of February, 2000. KASANGA MULWA JUDGE