[2002] KEHC 863 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 863 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant, having considered the submissions made. The judge found sufficient grounds to allow the application for extension of time to lodge the intended appeal, balancing the interests of justice and the parties' positions. The court also directed that costs of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 863 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Intra Africa Assurance; Respondent: Nelson M. Njoroge
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 344 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Intra Africa Assurance

Appellant

Nelson M. Njoroge

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to formally lodge the intended appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant, having considered the submissions made. The judge found sufficient grounds to allow the application for extension of time to lodge the intended appeal, balancing the interests of justice and the parties' positions. The court also directed that costs of the application, whether agreed or taxed, be paid to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted 7 days to formally lodge the intended appeal.
  • Costs of the application, either agreed or taxed, will be paid to the respondent.