[2024] KEHC 6658 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6658 (KLR)

The court found that since the application was dismissed for non-attendance over 20 years ago and no steps have been taken to tax or recover costs, the matter is now stale by operation of law. The statutory limitation period for recovery of costs has lapsed, making any further proceedings or recovery impossible....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6658 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Invesco Assurance Company Limited; Respondent: Isaac Onyango Nyatongo; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 97 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on File Closure and Archiving
Outcome
file closed and archived as stale; no further orders possible
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Costs Taxation, File Closure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Dismissal for Non Attendance Costs Taxation File Closure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Invesco Assurance Company Limited

Applicant

Isaac Onyango Nyatongo

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on File Closure and Archiving

  1. 1 Whether the matter should remain open after dismissal for non-attendance to prosecute.
  2. 2 Whether costs can be recovered more than 20 years after the last order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the application was dismissed for non-attendance over 20 years ago and no steps have been taken to tax or recover costs, the matter is now stale by operation of law. The statutory limitation period for recovery of costs has lapsed, making any further proceedings or recovery impossible. Accordingly, the file should be closed and archived as there is no legal basis to keep it open.

Court Disposition

file closed and archived as stale; no further orders possible

Orders

  • The file is hereby closed for archiving.