[2018] KEELRC 1323 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was employed continuously as a house help by the respondents for 12 years and was summarily dismissed for demanding better pay. The respondents failed to discharge their statutory burden to prove that the termination was for a valid reason and followed fair procedure, as required by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1323 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Irene Atieno; Respondent: Henry De’ Souza; Respondent: Annette De’ Souza
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1339 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant for unfair dismissal and underpayment.
- Judges
- AN Makau
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Domestic Worker Rights, Compensation for Dismissal, Salary Underpayment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irene Atieno
Applicant
Henry De’ Souza
Respondent
Annette De’ Souza
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the claimant was unfair within the meaning of section 45 of the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation and other reliefs sought for unfair termination and underpayment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was employed continuously as a house help by the respondents for 12 years and was summarily dismissed for demanding better pay. The respondents failed to discharge their statutory burden to prove that the termination was for a valid reason and followed fair procedure, as required by section 45 of the Employment Act. The court held that pleadings and submissions are not evidence and, in the absence of any testimony from the respondents, the claimant’s evidence was uncontroverted. The termination was therefore unfair. The court awarded the claimant 12 months’ salary as compensation for unfair termination, leave pay for one year, and salary underpayment for...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant for unfair dismissal and underpayment.
Orders
- The claimant is awarded Kshs.267,864.00 plus costs and interest from the date of judgment, less statutory deductions.
- Claims for severance pay and for Sundays and public holidays worked are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE. NO. 1339 OF 2011
IRENE ATIENO.........................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
HENRY DE’ SOUZA....................1ST RESPONDENT
ANNETTE DE’ SOUZA..............2NDRESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. The claimant brought this suit on 8. 8.2011 claiming salary underpayment from 2004 to May 2011, severance pay, accrued leave for one year 30 days, Sunday and public holidays worked plus compensation for unfair termination totalling to Kshs.648,007. 25. The respondent filed defence on 18. 10. 2011 alleging that the claimant was not her regular employee and denied the allegation that she worked continuously from 2. 5.1999 to 1. 5.2011. She therefore denied the alleged underpayment andclaim for unfair termination.
2. The suit was heard on 21. 2.2018 when the claimant testified as Cw1 but the respondent called no witness. Thereafter both parties filed written submissions.
Claimant’s Case
3. Cw1 testified that she was employed by the respondents as a House Help in 1999 and worked for 12 years. She started with a salary of Kshs.3,000 per month which was later increased to Kshs.6,000. She further testified that in 2011 she demanded for salary increment as a result of which she was dismissed. She contended that she served without any disciplinary case. She further contended that she used to sign a book to receive her salary which was retained by the employer. She further stated that she was never paid the salary for the last month of her service. She therefore prayed for the outstanding salary, service pay and other terminal dues.
4. On cross examination, Cw1 stated that she was never given a written contract. She however maintained that she used to sign a salary book which was retained by the employer. She contended that she was dismissed on 1. 5.2011 by the first respondent for demanding a salary increment. She contended that she used to be paid on the 5th day of thefollowing month as such the dismissal came before receiving her salary for April 2011.
Analysis and Determination
5. There is no dispute that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a House Help until 1. 5.2011 when she was dismissed. The issues for determination are:
(a) Whether the termination was unfair.
(b) Whether she, is entitled to the reliefs sought.
Unfair termination
6. Under section 45(2) of the Employment Act termination of an employee’s contract of service is unfair if the employer fails to prove that it was grounded on valid and fair reason and that it was done after following a fair procedure. In this case, the respondents never testified to discharge the said burden of proving procedural and substantive fairness in the termination of the claimant’s employment service. It is trite law that pleadings and submissions filed by defence counsel are not capable of rebutting oral evidence adduced by the claimant at the hearing. Consequently, I find that the claimant has proved on a balance of probability that she worked continuously as a House Help until she was summarily dismissed from employment on 1. 5.2011 for demandingbetter pay. The said termination was not justified and it was done without following due process and that rendered the termination unfair within the meaning of section 45 of the Employment Act.
Reliefs
7. Under section 49 of the Act, he is awarded 12 months salary being compensation for the unfair termination considering her 12 years of continuous service. This works to Kshs.93,053. 40 based on a monthly salary of Kshs.7,754. 45.
8. She is also awarded leave for one year as prayed being 21 days being Kshs.6,263. 20. The claim for salary under payment is also awarded as prayed being Kshs.23,823 for May 2004 to May 2005, Kshs.22,004. 40 for May 2005 to May 2006, Kshs.71,073 for May 2006 to May 2009, Kshs.24,594 for May 2009 to May 2010, Kshs.27. 053 for May 2010 to May 2011 totalling to Kshs.168,547. 40.
9. The claim for severance pay is however dismissed because the termination was not through redundancy. Likewise, the claim for Sundays and public holidays worked is dismissed for want of particulars and evidence.
Conclusion and Disposition
10. For the reasons that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, I enter judgment for him in the sum of Kshs.267,864. 00 plus costs and interest from the date hereof . The award is less statutory deductions.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in Open Court at Nairobi this 31stday of July, 2018
ONESMUS N. MAKAU
JUDGE