[2010] KEHC 2788 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2788 (KLR)

The court found that the appeal was filed out of time and without leave of the court, as there was no application or order granting such leave on record. The presence of a certificate of delay did not cure the defect, since the appeal was filed before the certificate was issued and no leave was sought. Consequently,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2788 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Irene Njoka; Respondent: Peter Njeru Nyaga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 77 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Leave of Court, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Out of Time Leave of Court Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Irene Njoka

Appellant

Peter Njeru Nyaga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed out of time without leave of the court.
  2. 2 Whether an order for stay pending appeal can be granted where there is no competent appeal before the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appeal was filed out of time and without leave of the court, as there was no application or order granting such leave on record. The presence of a certificate of delay did not cure the defect, since the appeal was filed before the certificate was issued and no leave was sought. Consequently, there was no competent appeal before the court. In the absence of a valid appeal, the court could not grant orders of stay pending appeal. The application for stay was therefore dismissed as devoid of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application dated 17/8/2009 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.