[2002] KECA 283 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 283 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondent, despite being granted an extension of time to lodge the record of appeal, failed to do so. This omission constituted a failure to take an essential step in the appellate process as required by rule 80 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The absence of any appearance or opposition from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 283 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Irene Wanjira Mararo; Respondent: Joseph Nguthiru Kin'garui
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 123 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application granted. Notice of Appeal struck out with costs to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Striking Out Proceedings, Court of Appeal Rules, Extension of Time, Failure to Take Essential Step
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Notice of Appeal Striking Out Proceedings Court of Appeal Rules Extension of Time Failure to Take Essential Step

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Irene Wanjira Mararo

Applicant

Joseph Nguthiru Kin'garui

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to take an essential step in lodging the record of appeal within the prescribed time after extension.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Appeal should be struck out under rule 80 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondent, despite being granted an extension of time to lodge the record of appeal, failed to do so. This omission constituted a failure to take an essential step in the appellate process as required by rule 80 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The absence of any appearance or opposition from the respondent further underscored the lack of compliance. Consequently, the Court granted the application and struck out the Notice of Appeal with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Notice of Appeal struck out with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal lodged on 29th March, 1994 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant.