[2025] KEELC 3095 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had obtained a limited grant ad litem for the estate of Njeru Ireri prior to filing the suit, which conferred locus standi to institute the proceedings. The trial court erred in striking out the suit for lack of letters of administration, as the record of appeal demonstrated that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 3095 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mary Rita Murangi Ireri; Respondent: Crispin Mirori Ireri
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 5 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Ruling of the trial court set aside. Costs awarded to the appellant.
- Judges
- AK Bor
- Legal Topics
- Trusts in Land, Letters of Administration, Locus Standi, Fraudulent Registration, Subdivision of Land
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Rita Murangi Ireri
Appellant
Crispin Mirori Ireri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had locus standi to institute the suit regarding the suit property as a beneficiary of the estate of Njeru Ireri.
- 2 Whether the trial court erred in striking out the suit for lack of letters of administration.
- 3 Whether the registration and subdivision of the suit property by the respondent was fraudulent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had obtained a limited grant ad litem for the estate of Njeru Ireri prior to filing the suit, which conferred locus standi to institute the proceedings. The trial court erred in striking out the suit for lack of letters of administration, as the record of appeal demonstrated that the requisite grant had been issued to the appellant before the suit was filed. The appellate court also noted a factual error in the trial court's characterization of the relationship between the parties and the deceased, which affected the trial court's reasoning. Consequently, the appellate court set aside the trial court's orders and allowed the appeal, holding that the...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Ruling of the trial court set aside. Costs awarded to the appellant.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The orders made vide the ruling delivered on 18/1/2022 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Ireri v Ireri (Environment and Land Appeal 5 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 3095 (KLR) (20 March 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 3095 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Embu
Environment and Land Appeal 5 of 2023
AK Bor, J
March 20, 2025
Between
Mary Rita Murangi Ireri
Appellant
and
Crispin Mirori Ireri
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Appellant instituted Embu MC ELC Case No. 17 of 2021 alongside Lucy Njoki Ireri and Isabella Rwamba Ireri, seeking cancellation of the registration of Ngandori/Kirigi/1761 (the suit property) in the Respondent’s name and for the land to revert to Njeru Ireri (deceased). They also sought cancellation of the subdivision and registration of Ngandori/Kirigi/12799, 12800 & 12801 in the Respondent’s name. Lucy Njoki Ireri and Isabela Rwamba Ireri who were plaintiffs in the suit before the trial court are not parties in this appeal.
2. The plaintiffs’ claim in Embu MC ELC Case No. 17 of 2021 was that on 10/3/1961, the late Njeru Ireri was registered as proprietor of the suit land to hold it in trust for himself and the entire family of Ireri Ngai (deceased) including the Respondent. The plaintiffs averred that they were sisters and the Respondent was their brother, and that the late Ireri Ngai was their father.
3. The Respondent raised a preliminary objection to the suit on grounds that it was statute-barred and that the plaintiffs lacked proper letters of administration to move the court. In its ruling delivered on 18/1/2023, the trial court struck out the suit and found that the plaintiffs had not exhibited any letters of administration obtained before filing the suit.
4. The issue for determination in this appeal is whether the court should allow the appeal and set aside the ruling of the trial court delivered on 18/1/2022. The court directed parties to file written submissions on the appeal which it has read and considered.
5. The plaintiffs’ contention before the trial court was that the suit property was registered in the name of Njeri Ireri on 10/3/1961 to hold in trust for himself and his siblings as the children of Ireri Ngai. That the Respondent fraudulently corrected his name and misrepresented himself as the late Njeru Ireri and caused the suit land to be registered in his name on 27/8/1982 purporting to be the late Njeru Ireri. The plaintiffs claimed that the Respondent had subdivided the suit land into three portions and intended to transfer two of the portions to his brother to the exclusion of the plaintiffs who were his sisters.
6. The Learned Magistrate started the ruling by giving the background of the dispute as stated in the plaint by mentioning the relationship of the parties as brother and sisters with Ireri Ngai as their common father. However, at paragraph 14 of the ruling, the Learned Magistrate noted thus:“It is also clear that the late Njeru Ireri who is the brother to Ireri Ngai was the registered owner of the suit land in trust of the plaintiffs’ father”.
7. The trial court fell into error because the plaintiffs’ claim was that the late Njeru Ireri was the son of Ireri Ngai and not his brother. The court found that the plaintiffs had not exhibited any letters of administration before filing the suit. The court notes that in the record of appeal, the Appellant included a Limited grant ad litem for the Estate of Njeru Ireri for purposes of filing suit issued to her on 19/7/2016. The plaint was filed on 17/3/2021.
8. The Appellant therefore had locus to bring the suit for the suit property which she claims was registered in the name of the late Njeru Ireri to hold in trust for his brothers and sisters.
9. The court allows the appeal. The orders made vide the ruling delivered on 18/1/2022 are set aside. The Appellant is awarded the costs of the appeal.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT EMBU THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. K. BORJUDGEIn the presence of: -Ms. Mary Murangi Ireri- Appellant appearing in personMr. Dennis Kariuki for the Respondent