[2025] KECA 454 (KLR)

[2025] KECA 454 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not supplied with the judgment in good time, a fact not denied by the respondent. Considering the circumstances, including the applicant's first appeal and the lengthy sentence, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time to appeal out of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECA 454 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paul Kamau Irungu; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application E012 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
PM Gachoka
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Out of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Kamau Irungu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against conviction and sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not supplied with the judgment in good time, a fact not denied by the respondent. Considering the circumstances, including the applicant's first appeal and the lengthy sentence, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time to appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 6th February 2025 is allowed.
  • The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days.