[2020] KEELRC 1233 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1233 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant was dismissed without written notice as required by Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent, despite being served and acknowledging the hearing notice, failed to attend court or provide evidence to justify the termination. The Claimant's testimony was unrebutted,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1233 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Irvine Gitari Josphat; Respondent: Equatorial Nut Processors Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1793 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; unfair termination found; compensation and notice pay awarded; statutory deduction claim dismissed; no costs awarded.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Periods, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Periods Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Irvine Gitari Josphat

Claimant

Equatorial Nut Processors Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair under the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation and pay in lieu of notice.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent failed to remit statutory deductions as alleged.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant was dismissed without written notice as required by Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent, despite being served and acknowledging the hearing notice, failed to attend court or provide evidence to justify the termination. The Claimant's testimony was unrebutted, and the Respondent did not discharge its statutory burden under Sections 43 and 45(1) to prove valid and fair reasons for termination. Consequently, the court held that the termination was unfair. The court awarded the Claimant compensation equivalent to three months' salary and one month's salary in lieu of notice, but dismissed the claim for unremitted statutory deductions due...

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; unfair termination found; compensation and notice pay awarded; statutory deduction claim dismissed; no costs awarded.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 120,000 as compensation for unfair termination.
  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 40,000 as pay in lieu of notice.