[2020] KEELRC 1233 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant was dismissed without written notice as required by Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent, despite being served and acknowledging the hearing notice, failed to attend court or provide evidence to justify the termination. The Claimant's testimony was unrebutted,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 1233 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Irvine Gitari Josphat; Respondent: Equatorial Nut Processors Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1793 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed; unfair termination found; compensation and notice pay awarded; statutory deduction claim dismissed; no costs awarded.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Notice Periods, Compensation for Termination
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irvine Gitari Josphat
Claimant
Equatorial Nut Processors Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair under the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation and pay in lieu of notice.
- 3 Whether the Respondent failed to remit statutory deductions as alleged.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant was dismissed without written notice as required by Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent, despite being served and acknowledging the hearing notice, failed to attend court or provide evidence to justify the termination. The Claimant's testimony was unrebutted, and the Respondent did not discharge its statutory burden under Sections 43 and 45(1) to prove valid and fair reasons for termination. Consequently, the court held that the termination was unfair. The court awarded the Claimant compensation equivalent to three months' salary and one month's salary in lieu of notice, but dismissed the claim for unremitted statutory deductions due...
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed; unfair termination found; compensation and notice pay awarded; statutory deduction claim dismissed; no costs awarded.
Orders
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 120,000 as compensation for unfair termination.
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 40,000 as pay in lieu of notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1793 OF 2015
IRVINE GITARI JOSPHAT..........................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
EQUATORIAL NUT PROCESSORS LTD............................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Irvine Gitari Josphat (Claimant) instituted these proceedings against Equatorial Nut Processors Ltd (Respondent) on 8 October 2015 alleging unfair termination of employment and breach of contract.
2. The Respondent filed a Reply to Claim on 5 November 2015.
3. When the Cause came up for hearing on 10 February 2020, the Respondent and its advocate were absent.
4. On record was an affidavit of service filed in Court on 10 February 2020 attesting to service and acknowledgement of a hearing notice by the Respondent’s advocate on 3 December 2019.
5. The Court being satisfied with the service allowed the hearing to proceed.
6. The Claimant testified but his submissions were not on file by the agreed date of 28 February 2020.
7. The Court has considered the pleadings and evidence on record.
Unfair termination of employment
8. The Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a Senior Purchasing Officer on 20 April 2014. He testified that around 18 March 2015 he fell ill (he produced a copy of medical treatment record dated 19 March 2015).
9. According to the Claimant, on 26 April 2015, he was invited to a meeting where he found the Respondent’s Chairman and Operations Director and that they told him they did not want to see him in the office.
10. The Claimant stated that he took the instruction as a dismissal, and asserted that it was unfair because he was not given notice of termination of employment.
11. The Respondent had in paragraph 7 of the Reply to Claim pleaded that the termination of the Claimant’s employment was for valid and fair reasons but did not attend Court to discharge the burden placed on it by sections 43 and 45(1) of the Employment Act, 2007.
12. Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007 contemplates written notice of termination of employment, and with the Claimant’s unrebutted testimony that none was given, the Court finds that the Claimant discharged the onus placed on him by section 47(5) of the Act to demonstrate that there was unfair termination of employment.
Compensation
13. The Claimant served the Respondent for about 2 years, and in consideration of the length of service, the Court is of the view that the equivalent of 3-months’ salary as compensation would be fair (gross salary was Kshs 40,000/-).
Pay in lieu of notice
14. Since the Respondent did not give the Claimant written notice as envisaged by section 35(1)(c) of the Employment Act, 2007, the Court will allow the claim for 1-month salary in lieu of notice.
Breach of contract
15. The Claimant contended that the Respondent deducted but did not remit statutory dues to the National Social Security Fund and National Hospital Insurance Fund.
16. The Claimant did not produce any account statements from the two Funds, and the Court finds that these heads of the Claim were not proved to the required standard.
Conclusion and Orders
17. From the foregoing, the Court finds and declares that the termination pf the Claimant’s employment was unfair and awards him
(a) Compensation Kshs 120,000/-
(b) Pay in lieu of notice Kshs 40,000/-
TOTAL Kshs 160,000/-
18. The Claimant is denied costs for not filing submissions within agreed timelines.
Dated, signed and delivered through email in Nairobi on this 24th day of April 2020.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Njagi instructed by Mwenda Njagi & Co. Advocates
For Respondent C.N. Kihara & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Judy Maina