[2017] KEELC 2252 (KLR)
The court found that both parties, through their respective advocates, freely entered into a consent to resolve the boundary dispute concerning parcel No. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652. The consent was clear, lawful, and addressed the core issue in dispute. There was no evidence of fraud, collusion, or any vitiating factor....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2252 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Irvine Mwenda Japhet; Defendant: M’Kanga M’Rwito Kanyinyiro
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 212 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Dispute / Consent Order Ruling
- Outcome
- Consent adopted as order of the court.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Consent Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irvine Mwenda Japhet
Plaintiff
M’Kanga M’Rwito Kanyinyiro
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Dispute / Consent Order Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent entered by the parties should be adopted as an order of the court.
- 2 Whether the boundaries of the parcels MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652 should be established by the District Surveyor and Land Registrar.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both parties, through their respective advocates, freely entered into a consent to resolve the boundary dispute concerning parcel No. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652. The consent was clear, lawful, and addressed the core issue in dispute. There was no evidence of fraud, collusion, or any vitiating factor. Accordingly, the court adopted the consent as its order, directing the District Surveyor and District Land Registrar, Meru South District, to visit the parcel and establish the boundaries within 60 days. The parties were directed to follow up on the implementation of the consent order.
Court Disposition
Consent adopted as order of the court.
Orders
- The consent dated 21st June, 2017 is adopted as an order of the court.
- The District Surveyor and District Land Registrar, Meru South District, shall visit parcel No. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652 to establish boundaries within 60 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO 212 OF 2017
IRVINE MWENDA JAPHET…..…………………………..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
M’KANGA M’RWITO KANYINYIRO..………….....….. DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The parties were in court on 21st June, 2017 and proffered a consent which they asked the court to adopt as its order.
2. The consent which is dated 21st June, 2017 is in the following terms:
CONSENT
By consent of the parties and their respective advocates the order of this court dated 16th day of March, 2017 be amended to read as follows:
“The District Surveyor & The District Land Registrar Meru South District do visit parcel No. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652 and MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/4652 to establish the boundaries of the respective parcels of land within 60 days.”
DATED AT CHUKA THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2017
Basilio Gitonga & co. advocate for plaintiff
Muia Mwanzia & co. Advocates for defendant
3. This consent is adopted as an order of this court.
4. The parties should follow up issues concerning implementation of this consent.
5. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 21st day of June, 2017 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Muriithi for the plaintiff
Muia Mwanzia for the defendant
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE