[2012] KEHC 5923 (KLR)
The court found that the injuries sustained by the appellant were less severe and fewer in number compared to those in the cited precedents, where similar or lesser amounts were awarded. The court also considered the change in the value of the Kenya Shilling over time and concluded that the award of Ksh.70,000/- by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5923 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Isaac Gitau Ngugi; Respondent: Kakuzi Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 426 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- DA Onyancha
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Personal Injury, Quantum of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaac Gitau Ngugi
Appellant
Kakuzi Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the quantum of damages awarded by the lower court was inordinately low or erroneous.
- 2 Whether the award of Ksh.70,000/- for a single shallow injury was justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the injuries sustained by the appellant were less severe and fewer in number compared to those in the cited precedents, where similar or lesser amounts were awarded. The court also considered the change in the value of the Kenya Shilling over time and concluded that the award of Ksh.70,000/- by the lower court was reasonable and not inordinately low. There was no lawful reason to interfere with the trial court's discretion in awarding damages, and the appeal lacked merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURT
Civil Appeal 426 of 2005
ISAAC GITAU NGUGI. ................................................. APPELLANT
VERSUS
KAKUZI LIMITED. ..................................................... RESPONDENT
(From the judgment and decree of S M Mogoka in Thika CMCC No. 101 of 2003)
J U D G M E N T
This appeal was filed to challenge only the quantum of damages. Judgment on liability had been filed by consent of the parties.
A medical report written by Dr. Timothy Kagoda Byakika in respect to the relevant injuries sustained by the Appellant in this case show the following injuries: -
1. A broad shallow cut wound 5 cm on the dorsal side of left wrist which left an unsightly broad scar. The cut wound did not interfere with tendons and had healed well. It amounted to a partial disability of 2%. The patient was 24 years old.
In the case of Esther Nyambura Munyiri Vs Christopher M Muteti & 2 others, in Nairobi HCCC No. 1780 of 1990 the Plaintiff had suffered the following injuries: -
1. Bruises to the neck, head, left ear, right shoulder, left hip and laceration on the forehead. He complained of headache, giddiness, forgetfulness, pain in the left hip and difficulty in hearing. The court awarded ksh.50,000/- as general damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities.
In the case of Francis Muiruri Kariuki Vs Samuel Njoroge Kimingi & Another, Nairobi HCCC No. 1313 of 1987, the Plaintiff had suffered the following: -
1. A small cut on the right side of the head, deep cut wound on the right trunk and a cut wound on the lumbar region. He remained with scars on the right side of the head 2 cm long and on the back measuring 10 x 2 cm across. The scar on the back was hypertrophic.
The court awarded Ksh.50,000/- as general damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities.
Comparing the injury sustained in this case before the court with those in the two cited cases, the court comes to the conclusion that the injuries in the cases are more in number and severity than that the single injury of the Appellant in this case.
The only difference is in relation to the strength of the Kenya Shilling between 1991 or 1993 and 2005 when the lower court awarded a sum of Ksh.70,000/- which is about 40% more.
I have carefully considered the issue as to whether the sum awarded above is so inordinately low that it must be wholly erroneous. I however, come to the conclusion that the award of Ksh.70,000/- was a correct amount to award in respect to a single totally shallow injury on the dorsal side of the wrist. I find no lawful reason to interfere with the award.
In the circumstances this court finds that this appeal has no merit. It dismisses it with costs to the Respondent. Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 8th day of October, 2012.
..............................................
D A ONYANCHA
JUDGE