[2021] KEHC 4023 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4023 (KLR)

The court found that the reasons advanced by the appellant, namely that the sentence was harsh and excessive and that mitigation was not considered, were not sufficient to demonstrate that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success or that there existed exceptional circumstances to warrant the grant of bond...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4023 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Isaack Mulaa Jacob; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal E036 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bond Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for bond pending appeal dismissed; appeal admitted for hearing by written submissions
Legal Topics
Obtaining by False Pretence, Sentencing, Bail Pending Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Obtaining by False Pretence Sentencing Bail Pending Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaack Mulaa Jacob

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bond Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to bond pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was harsh and excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reasons advanced by the appellant, namely that the sentence was harsh and excessive and that mitigation was not considered, were not sufficient to demonstrate that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success or that there existed exceptional circumstances to warrant the grant of bond pending appeal. The application for bond pending appeal was therefore dismissed, and directions were given for the appeal to proceed by way of written submissions.

Court Disposition

application for bond pending appeal dismissed; appeal admitted for hearing by written submissions

Orders

  • The application for bond pending appeal is dismissed.
  • The appeal is admitted for hearing by way of written submissions.