[2021] KEELC 3365 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3365 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success by providing evidence of registered ownership of the suit land and long-term possession. The absence of any response or defence from the defendant further strengthened the plaintiff's position. The court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3365 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Isaac Munga Manyara; Defendant: Ann Njoki Muna
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 13 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
application_allowed
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Ownership Disputes, Possession and Eviction, Succession and Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Land Ownership Disputes Possession and Eviction Succession and Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Munga Manyara

Plaintiff

Ann Njoki Muna

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit land pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favour of granting the injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success by providing evidence of registered ownership of the suit land and long-term possession. The absence of any response or defence from the defendant further strengthened the plaintiff's position. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff would suffer considerable loss if the defendant was not restrained from interfering with his possession, and that damages would not be an adequate remedy given the nature of land rights. Accordingly, the court granted the temporary injunction as sought in the application, pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.

Court Disposition

application_allowed

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the defendant, her servants, agents, or anybody or authority from taking over, evicting the plaintiff from, selling, disposing of or in any other manner interfering with the plaintiff’s quiet possession of parcels of land known as WAITALUK/KAPKOI BLOCK 11/GUTONGORIO/52...
  • The costs of the application shall be in the cause.