[2013] KEHC 2259 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2259 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any irreparable harm or substantial loss that would result from complying with the orders of 17-7-2013, specifically the payment of dues to the respondent. The applicant did not show that the respondent would be unable to refund the sums if the appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2259 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rev. Isaac Murwon; Respondent: Rev. Simon Alovi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 99 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
application partly allowed
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal, Review of Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Review of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rev. Isaac Murwon

Applicant

Rev. Simon Alovi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the court's orders issued on 17-7-2013 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal against the orders of 17-7-2013.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any irreparable harm or substantial loss that would result from complying with the orders of 17-7-2013, specifically the payment of dues to the respondent. The applicant did not show that the respondent would be unable to refund the sums if the appeal succeeded. The court also found the applicant's claim of lack of notice to be untrue, as counsel was present on the material day. While the court granted leave to appeal, it declined to grant a stay of execution, holding that the threshold for stay had not been met. The costs of the application were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application partly allowed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted to the applicant.
  • Stay of execution is denied.