[2021] KEHC 3712 (KLR)
The High Court found that while the sentence of one year imprisonment for malicious damage to property was lawful and lenient given the statutory maximum, the trial court failed to adequately consider alternatives to imprisonment for a first offender. The judge noted that the applicant's actions, though unjustified,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3712 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Isaac Odhiambo Aluoch; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E087B of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence revised; custodial sentence set aside and substituted with a fine
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Damage to Property, Sentencing Principles, First Offender Treatment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaac Odhiambo Aluoch
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant for malicious damage to property was lawful and appropriate.
- 2 Whether alternatives to imprisonment should have been considered for a first offender.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that while the sentence of one year imprisonment for malicious damage to property was lawful and lenient given the statutory maximum, the trial court failed to adequately consider alternatives to imprisonment for a first offender. The judge noted that the applicant's actions, though unjustified, occurred in the context of public protest and that the applicant had pleaded guilty and sought pardon. The court emphasized the need to decongest prisons, especially for petty offences, and the appropriateness of non-custodial sentences where possible. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction, the court set aside the custodial sentence and substituted it with a fine of KES...
Court Disposition
sentence revised; custodial sentence set aside and substituted with a fine
Orders
- The sentence of one year imprisonment imposed on Isaac Odhiambo Aluoch is set aside.
- The applicant shall pay a fine of KES 20,000 to the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E087B OF 2021
CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J
ISAAC ODHIAMBO ALUOCH.................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...............................................................................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Application seeking revision of sentence in Ukwala Senior Resident Magistrate Court
in Cr. Case No.607 of 2021 on 11. 8.2021 by Hon. C.N. Sindani, Principal Magistrate)
RULING
1. The applicant in this revision application is a convict in Ukwala PM’s court Cr. Case No. 607 of 2021. He faced a charge of malicious damage to property contrary to Section 339(1) of the Penal Code. He pleaded guilty to the charge and facts where it was stated that on 2/8/2021 at Sega C.B.O stage, Ugunja Sub County, Siaya county, he willfully and unlawfully damaged the phone make Samsung A10S valued at Kshs. 15,000/= the property of Dancan Onyango Aloo.
2. Upon conviction, on his own Plea of guilty, the applicant in mitigation asked for pardon and was sentenced to serve one 91) year imprisonment on 11/8/2021.
3. I have perused the proceedings before the lower court. They were regularly conducted and the sentence imposed was lawful and lenient.
4. I have also considered circumstances under which the offence was committed. The complainant is alleged to have gone to a scene of accident and started taking videos (filming) in the midst of protests by bodaboda operators against an accident at Sega stage. The convict took the complainant’s phone. Which was being use for filming the accident scene and smashed it on the road for which act damaged the screen.
5. According to the prosecution, the accused was a first offender his actions were and cannot be justified in any way. He deserved a deterrent sentence. However, being a first offender and bearing in mind the circumstances under which the admitted offence was committed, the trial court had the discretion to mete out various modes of punishment available in law. He could have called for a Probation/Presentence report before deciding whether the convict deserved a prison term.
6. I have considered the Plea by the convict through his counsel. The offence of malicious damage to property attracts upto five years imprisonment upon conviction under Section 339(1) of the Penal Code. Therefore one year imprisonment was lenient and lawful but for a first offender, alternatives to prison term should have been considered, including a fine.
7. Prisons are crowded because petty offenders occupy majority of the spaces and in the current dispensation, owing to covid-19 pandemic, even after conviction, convicts are held at police stations for unnecessarily longer periods before they are admitted to prisons, for quarantine before they are integrated with other prisoners.
8. For the above reasons, I exercise discretion and revise the sentence imposed on the convict Isaac Odhiambo Aluoch and set it aside and substitute it with an order that the convict Isaac Odhiambo Aluoch shall pay into this court a fine of Kenya shillings Twenty Thousand only in default, to serve one year imprisonment. I so order.
9. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE