[2021] KEELC 4402 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4402 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its order to file written submissions within 30 days as directed on 26/10/2020. No submissions were filed by the appellant, and there was no evidence of any further steps taken to prosecute the appeal. The court confirmed that the appeal was to be deemed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 4402 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Isaac Ouma Kumba; Respondent: Peres Awiti Oyamo; Respondent: Millicent Adhiambo Oyamo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 9 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeals Process, Failure to Prosecute, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeals Process Failure to Prosecute Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Ouma Kumba

Appellant

Peres Awiti Oyamo

Respondent

Millicent Adhiambo Oyamo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to file submissions as ordered.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in prosecuting the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its order to file written submissions within 30 days as directed on 26/10/2020. No submissions were filed by the appellant, and there was no evidence of any further steps taken to prosecute the appeal. The court confirmed that the appeal was to be deemed dismissed for want of prosecution as previously warned, and thus formally dismissed the appeal with costs to the respondents. The decision was based on the appellant's non-compliance with procedural requirements and the need to ensure expeditious disposal of cases.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • Costs awarded to the respondents.