[2015] KEHC 8078 (KLR)
The court found that the circumstances of the offence were grave, involving the use of a dangerous weapon and actual violence against the complainant, who was injured and thrown into a trench. The trial magistrate's reduction of the charge from capital robbery to simple robbery was not justified, but since the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 8078 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Isaack Jillo Doyo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 489 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Reduction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentencing, Criminal Revision, Use of Dangerous Weapon
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaack Jillo Doyo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Reduction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for simple robbery was correct, legal, or proper under the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the sentence should be reduced given the applicant's near completion of the term.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the circumstances of the offence were grave, involving the use of a dangerous weapon and actual violence against the complainant, who was injured and thrown into a trench. The trial magistrate's reduction of the charge from capital robbery to simple robbery was not justified, but since the matter was not an appeal, the court confined itself to the propriety of the sentence. Given the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence, the court held that the applicant should serve the full term of imprisonment, notwithstanding the short period remaining on his sentence. The application for reduction of sentence was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for reduction of sentence is dismissed.
- The applicant shall serve the full term of imprisonment as imposed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 489 OF 2015
ISAACK JILLO DOYO………..……………………….……..APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..RESPONDENT
RULING
Pursuant to Section 362 of Criminal Procedure Code, the Lower Court record has been forwarded to this court so that the court can examine the same for purposes of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of the sentence passed in the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Makadara Criminal Case No. 4833 of 2010. In that case, the Applicant who was the accused was charged with robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code. It was alleged that on 11th December, 2010 at National Concrete Kariobangi, in Nairobi, within Nairobi area jointly with others not before court while armed with a dangerous weapon namely a pistol robbed Samson Ochieng Oyugi of Kshs. 500/=, a mobile phone make Nokia 3310 valued at Kshs. 3,000/= and at or immediately before or immediately after the time of such robbery used actual violence to the said Samson Ochieng Oyugi. The Applicant was found guilty for the offence of simple robbery under Section 296(1) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve four years imprisonment.
In his submission, he urged the court for leniency on noting that he only had 72 days to complete the sentence.
Ms. Atina for the Respondent opposed the application. She submitted that although the Applicant was found guilty for simple robbery, the facts of the case were that the complainant was injured and he lost a mobile phone and cash during the robbery. The offence was only reduced on grounds of what the magistrate said was because the assault weapon was not found and other accomplices were not arrested. She urged the court to decline the application and order that the Applicant serves the full sentence.
I have accordingly considered the respective submissions. It is worthwhile to note that the attackers were armed with a dangerous weapon namely, a pistol. The complainant who testified as PW1 was injured in the process of the robbery and after the robbery he was thrown into a trench and was rescued by passersby who also gave chase to the attackers and managed to arrest the Applicant. The reasoning of the learned trial magistrate for reducing the offence from capital robbery to simple robbery in my view was not justified. Be that as it may, since this is not an appeal, I would confine myself to determining whether the sentence should be reduced. It is my view, as submitted by learned state counsel that the circumstances under which the offence was committed were grave and although the Applicant has 72 days only to complete the sentence, he should serve the full term as a deterrent measure. The application is accordingly dismissed.
DATED and DELIVERED this 14th day of December, 2015.
G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Applicant present in person
M/s Atina for the Respondent.