[2020] KEELRC 86 (KLR)
The court found that the claim was uncontested as the respondent failed to appear or file a valid response. The claimant's evidence was unchallenged and supported the reliefs sought, including unpaid salary, uniform refund, public holiday pay, service pay, and issuance of a certificate of service. The court held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 86 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Isack Chacha; Respondent: Security Alert Services Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 805 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed in full
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Terminal Dues, Unpaid Salary, Service Pay, Public Holiday Pay, Certificate of Service, Costs and Interest
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isack Chacha
Claimant
Security Alert Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid salary, uniform refund, public holiday pay, service pay, certificate of service, costs, and interest.
- 2 Whether the respondent's failure to appear or file a response affects the outcome of the claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claim was uncontested as the respondent failed to appear or file a valid response. The claimant's evidence was unchallenged and supported the reliefs sought, including unpaid salary, uniform refund, public holiday pay, service pay, and issuance of a certificate of service. The court held that the respondent's conduct indicated no serious opposition to the claim. The court allowed the claim in full, awarding the claimed sum, certificate of service, costs, and interest at 16% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Court Disposition
claim allowed in full
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 27,957.
- Respondent to issue a certificate of service to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOURRELATIONS COURT
AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 805 OF 2017
BETWEEN
ISACK CHACHA...............................................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
SECURITY ALERT SERVICES LIMITED...............................................RESPONDENT
Rika J
Court Assistant: Andrew Mwabanga
M.K.Mulei & Company Advocates for the Claimant
George Egunza & Associates, Advocates for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Claim highlights the need for a Small Claims Court.
2. It was filed on 11th October 2017.
3. The Claimant states, he was employed by the Respondent as a Security Guard on 1st November 2013. He earned Kshs. 8,500 monthly. He had annual leave balance of 130 days. He applied for, and was granted 130 days of annual leave, beginning 13th April 2016, to end on 23rd August 2016.
4. The Respondent ceased communication with the Claimant. The Claimant states that he resigned effective 23rd June August 2016. He was not paid terminal dues. He claims: -
a. Balance of August 2016 salary at Kshs. 8,500.
b. Uniform refund at Kshs. 5,400.
c. Public holiday pay, at Kshs. 7,519.
d. Service pay at Kshs. 6,538.
Total…Kshs. 27,957.
e. Certificate of Service to issue.
f. Costs.
g. Interest.
h. Any other relief.
5. The Respondent was served with the Statement of Claim and Summons on 30th October 2017. There was default in entering Appearance and filing Statement of Response. On 23rd January 2018, the Claimant requested for a date for formal proof.
6. On 1st February 2019, more than a year after receiving the Summons, the Respondent filed a Memorandum of Appearance through the Law Firm of George Egunza & Associates.
7. The Claim was scheduled for hearing on 12th November 2019. The Claimant and his Advocate attended Court. The Respondent and its Advocates did not. Instead, the Respondent filed a Statement of Response in the morning of the hearing date, without the leave of the Court, and did not even attend Court to seek any orders of the Court, pursuant to the irregular and late filing of the Statement of Response. The Court expunged the Statement of Response from the record, and proceeded to record the evidence of the Claimant.
8. He adopted the contents of his Statement of Claim, as summarized at the outset in this Judgment.
The Court Finds:-
9. As observed above, this is a matter that is suitable to be dealt with in a Small Claims Court, not in a Court designated by the Constitution of Kenya, as a Superior Court of Record.
10. The Claim is uncontested. It has a value of Kshs. 27,957. The Respondent does not appear, by its conduct, to have been in serious opposition to the Claim. Should such a Claim be filed in a Superior Court of Record, and take 3 years to be finalized? This is a Claim that should have been resolved at the Parties’ own level; at the Labour Office; or, going forward, should be dealt with in a Small Claims Court.
11. It is allowed, as follows: -
a. Kshs. 27,957 to be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant.
b. Certificate of Service to issue.
c. Costs to the Claimant.
d. Interest allowed at the rate of 16% per annum from the date of Judgment till payment is made in full.
Dated, signed and released to the Parties electronically at Nairobi, under the Ministry of Health and Judiciary Covid-19 Guidelines, this 15th day of December 2020.
James Rika
Judge