[2002] KECA 89 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 89 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal, after considering the submissions of both parties and the record of the High Court, found no merit in the appeal against conviction and sentence. The appellate judges were satisfied that the trial court properly evaluated the evidence and applied the correct legal principles. There was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 89 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Isaiah Kisur Korinyang; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 76 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Criminal Appeal, Conviction, Sentence, Dismissal of Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Appeal Conviction Sentence Dismissal of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaiah Kisur Korinyang

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court were proper and should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal, after considering the submissions of both parties and the record of the High Court, found no merit in the appeal against conviction and sentence. The appellate judges were satisfied that the trial court properly evaluated the evidence and applied the correct legal principles. There was no miscarriage of justice or error in law or fact that would warrant interference with the conviction or sentence. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed and the conviction and sentence of the High Court were upheld.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is hereby dismissed.