[2005] KEHC 1495 (KLR)
Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules is inapplicable where the previous suit was struck out by the court and not discontinued by the plaintiff. In this case, the previous suit between the same parties and on the same cause of action was struck out, not discontinued. Therefore, the defendant's application for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1495 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ishmael Kagunyi Thande; Defendant: Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 336 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Costs of Discontinued Suit, Order 24 Rule 4, Striking Out, Subsequent Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ishmael Kagunyi Thande
Plaintiff
Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules applies where the previous suit was struck out rather than discontinued.
- 2 Whether the present suit should be stayed pending payment of costs from the previous suit.
Ratio Decidendi
Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules is inapplicable where the previous suit was struck out by the court and not discontinued by the plaintiff. In this case, the previous suit between the same parties and on the same cause of action was struck out, not discontinued. Therefore, the defendant's application for a stay of the present suit pending payment of costs under this rule cannot succeed. Additionally, the court was informed that the costs in the previous suit have already been paid. As a result, there is no basis for granting the stay sought by the defendant, and the application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The defendant's application by notice of motion dated 25th June, 2004 is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBICOMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANICivil Case 336 of 2003
ISHMAEL KAGUNYI THANDE…………...……………….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY OF
KENYA LIMITED…………………………………………DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
Rule 4 of Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules (the Rules) provides that if any subsequent suit shall be brought before payment of the costs of a discontinued suit upon the same or substantially the same cause of action the court may order a stay of such subsequent suit until such costs shall have been paid.
In the present case it is clear that the previous suit, HCCC No. 896 of 2000, which was between the same parties upon substantially the same cause of action, was not discontinued by the Plaintiff herein, who was also the plaintiff in that previous suit. It was struck out by order of the court. Rule 4 aforesaid cannot therefore be properly invoked. In any event, consequent upon subsequent proceedings and orders herein, especially the order entered on 21st June, 2005, the court was informed on 19th July, 2005 that the costs in the previous suit have since been paid.
As the application by notice of motion dated 25th June, 2004 (in which the Defendant sought an order to stay the present suit pending payment by the Plaintiff of the costs in the previous suit) has not been withdrawn it is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2005. H.P.G. WAWERU JUDGEDELIVERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2005.