[2022] KEELC 2580 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 2580 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had complied with previous orders by including Isiolo County Government in the plaint and effecting substituted service through newspaper advertisement. There was no opposition to the application, and the amendments sought were necessary for the proper determination of the issues...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 2580 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Isiolo Printing Press; Defendant: Robe Godana & 3 others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 014 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Amend Plaint and for Substituted Service
Outcome
Application allowed; leave to further amend plaint and for substituted service granted.
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Substituted Service, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Substituted Service Joinder of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isiolo Printing Press

Plaintiff

Robe Godana & 3 others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Amend Plaint and for Substituted Service

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to further amend its amended plaint to add the 22nd intended defendant.
  2. 2 Whether substituted service by advertisement in a daily newspaper should be allowed for the 3rd to 21st defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had complied with previous orders by including Isiolo County Government in the plaint and effecting substituted service through newspaper advertisement. There was no opposition to the application, and the amendments sought were necessary for the proper determination of the issues in controversy. The court exercised its discretion to allow the further amendment of the plaint and granted leave for substituted service on the 3rd to 21st defendants by advertisement. The court also directed compliance with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules and set a hearing date for the suit.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; leave to further amend plaint and for substituted service granted.

Orders

  • The application dated June 23, 2022 is allowed with no order as to costs.
  • The applicant’s advocate is directed to serve the orders issued by this court today upon the other parties.