https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12657

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12657

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to revise the decision of another judge of concurrent jurisdiction, and that granting the relief sought would amount to sitting on appeal over the judgment of Hon. Lady Justice A. Ong'injo, J. The application was therefore struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 12657 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Islam Joseph Odhiambo Ogunda; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E106 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Revision Application
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Judges
["PK Rotich"]
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Section 333(1) Criminal Procedure Code, Credit for Time Spent in Custody, Probation Request, Concurrent Jurisdiction, Striking Out for Want of Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sentencing Revision Jurisdiction Section 333(1) Criminal Procedure Code Credit for Time Spent in Custody Probation Request Concurrent Jurisdiction +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Islam Joseph Odhiambo Ogunda

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Revision Application

  1. 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to revise a sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's pre-sentence custody period was properly accounted for under section 333(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code
  3. 3 Whether the applicant could be placed on probation in a revision application

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to revise the decision of another judge of concurrent jurisdiction, and that granting the relief sought would amount to sitting on appeal over the judgment of Hon. Lady Justice A. Ong'injo, J. The application was therefore struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The miscellaneous criminal application was struck out.