[2022] KEET 793 (KLR)

[2022] KEET 793 (KLR)

The Tribunal determined that, consistent with its prior decision in the Kai appeal and the statutory framework under the Energy Act, 2019 and the Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations, 2012, it lacks original jurisdiction to hear disputes relating to charges and disconnection or discontinuance of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEET 793 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ismail Holdings Company Ltd; Respondent: Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd
Court
Energy & Petroleum Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E016 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Directions
Outcome
Dispute referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution; Tribunal declined jurisdiction.
Judges
D.K Mwirigi, B.H Wasioya, D Jemator, F. M Kavita, Samuel Maina Karanja
Legal Topics
Energy Regulation, Dispute Referral, Regulatory Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Commercial and Corporate Energy Regulation Dispute Referral Regulatory Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ismail Holdings Company Ltd

Applicant

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear disputes over charges leading to disconnection or discontinuance of power supply.
  2. 2 Whether the dispute should be referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined that, consistent with its prior decision in the Kai appeal and the statutory framework under the Energy Act, 2019 and the Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations, 2012, it lacks original jurisdiction to hear disputes relating to charges and disconnection or discontinuance of power supply. Such disputes must first be referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution. Only after EPRA has addressed the matter may the Tribunal be seized of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Tribunal declined to entertain the application and referred the dispute to EPRA for determination.

Court Disposition

Dispute referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution; Tribunal declined jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The dispute is referred to the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) for resolution.
  • The Tribunal declines to exercise jurisdiction in the first instance.